Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1997;8(1):3-6; discussion 6-7.
doi: 10.1007/BF01920286.

Change in urethral pressure during voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction and vaginal electrical stimulation

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Change in urethral pressure during voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction and vaginal electrical stimulation

K Bø et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1997.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of voluntary pelvic floor muscle (FFM) contraction and vaginal electrical stimulation on urethral pressure. Twelve women with genuine stress incontinence, mean age 49.4 years (range 33-66) participated in the study. The urethral and bladder pressures were recorded simultaneously through a double-lumen 8 Ch catheter. The patients first performed three voluntary PFM contractions. Then two electrical stimulators, Conmax and Medicon MS 105, 50 Hz, were used in random order. A visual analog scale was used to measure pain and discomfort. Pain was reported to mean 6.8, SEM 0.64 (range 0.7-9.9) and mean 6.1, SEM 0.81 (range 0-9.1) with Conmax and Medicon MS 105, respectively. The mean paired difference in favor of voluntary contraction with Conmax was -8.0, SD 6.7, P = 0.0067, and with Medicon MS 105 it was -12.2, SD 5.9, P = 0.0022. The results demonstrated that voluntary PFM contraction increased urethral pressure significantly more than did vaginal electrical stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Sep;97(9):770-9 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Feb;94(2):147-56 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1991;137:131-3 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Jun;94(6):575-82 - PubMed
    1. J Reprod Med. 1993 Sep;38(9):684-91 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources