Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1997 Sep;21(7):706-14.
doi: 10.1007/s002689900295.

Local excision of rectal cancer

Affiliations
Review

Local excision of rectal cancer

R Bleday. World J Surg. 1997 Sep.

Abstract

The prospect of treating a rectal cancer often leads to significant fear among patients because of the possibility of a permanent colostomy. Although radical resection, in particular abdominoperineal resection, has been used effectively for rectal cancer treatment, other techniques such as local excision with or without adjuvant therapy have been used with significantly less morbidity than that of the abdominoperineal resection, with excellent cure rates. There are essentially three local excision techniques that can be used to remove a small rectal cancer completely. Selection criteria are critical for choosing the appropriate patient for these techniques. Tumors must be less than 4 cm in diameter and take up less than 40% of the rectal wall circumference. They also need to be relatively close to the dentate line and have no evidence of any invasion into the mesorectum or perirectal nodes. Preoperative staging with endorectal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and digital examination helps select appropriate patients. Retrospective series have shown significant success using local excision techniques, with local recurrence rates ranging from 0% to 11% for early-stage lesions. Prospective series have shown similar recurrence rates. Postoperative function with or without adjuvant therapy has not been adequately documented along with quality of life and must be part of any future reports on local excision techniques as well as all rectal cancer treatment studies. Local excision does, however, seem to provide adequate treatment in well selected patients and provides a less morbid alternative to the treatment of rectal cancer than radical resection, particularly abdominoperineal resection, which obligates the patient to a permanent colostomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources