Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Aug;41(4):485-500.
doi: 10.1016/S0003-4878(97)00008-2.

The variability of exposure over time: a prospective longitudinal study

Affiliations

The variability of exposure over time: a prospective longitudinal study

C Peretz et al. Ann Occup Hyg. 1997 Aug.

Abstract

Four hundred and forty personal air measurements were carried out on 54 workers, employed in the main processes in six different factories (6-13 in each). Potential exposure was to lead, benzene and dust. Ten randomly repeated hygiene surveys were carried out over 1 year. In order to estimate the magnitude of the variability in workers' exposure over time, its sources, the variance between workers and the variance within a worker, a nested unbalanced analysis-of-variance model was fitted to the log-transformed data. Of the total exposure variance, the within variance of a worker's exposure over time was 51% (geometrical standard deviation, GSD = 3.1) and the between workers, factories and air contaminants variance was 49%. The exposure variance between all the workers was due mainly to variance between workers within the same factory (67%). Outdoor locations, mobility of the worker and mobility of the sources of exposure result in a positive influence on both the variance between (26%, ANOVA) and the variance of a worker over time (39%, regression). These variables are therefore important in the sampling strategy of workers' exposure. For valid compliance testing and assessment of workers' exposure the mean and the within- and between-variance of the workers' exposure over time should be considered. The exposure should be measured several times a year randomly in order to prevent workers misclassification. To assess yearly exposure, a GSD = 3.1 can be used to calculate confidence limits for the arithmetic mean of worker's exposure measurements, in circumstances similar to those in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources