Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1997 Sep 1;157(5):521-6.

Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial

S K Buehler et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a simple call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening among women not screened in the previous 3 years.

Design: Prospective randomized controlled study.

Setting: Two family medicine clinics (1 urban, 1 rural) affiliated with Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's.

Participants: A sample of women aged 18-69 years who were listed as patients of the clinics but who had not had a Papanicolaou test (Pap test) within the 3 years before the start of the study. Of 9071 women listed as patients 1360 (15.0%) had not undergone screening in the previous 3 years. A random sample of 650 were selected, 209 of whom were excluded because they had had a hysterectomy, had had a recent Pap test, had moved or had records containing clerical errors. This left 441 women for the study.

Intervention: The 221 women in the intervention group were sent a letter asking them to seek a Pap test and a reminder letter 4 weeks later. The 220 in the control group were sent no letters.

Main outcome measures: Number of women who had a Pap test within 2 months and 6 months after the first letter was sent.

Results: Within 2 months, more women in the intervention group than in the control group had been screened (2.8% [5/178] and 1.9% (4/208] respectively). There was also a difference between the overall proportions at 6 months (10.7% [19/178] and 6.3% [13/208] respectively). None of the differences was statistically significant.

Conclusion: A letter of invitation is not sufficient to encourage women who have never or have infrequently undergone a Pap test to come in for cervical cancer screening. The effectiveness of added recruitment methods such as opportunistic screening by physicians, follow-up by telephone and the offer of a specific appointment should be evaluated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Am J Public Health. 1980 Apr;70(4):418-20 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Jul 18;295(6591):181-2 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1989 Jul 8;299(6691):98-100 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1989 Jul 15;299(6692):163-6 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1990 Feb 10;300(6721):376-8 - PubMed

Publication types