Use of alfentanil and propofol for outpatient monitored anesthesia care: determining the optimal dosing regimen
- PMID: 9296410
- DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199709000-00015
Use of alfentanil and propofol for outpatient monitored anesthesia care: determining the optimal dosing regimen
Abstract
Propofol and alfentanil are both rapid and short-acting drugs that can be used for sedation and analgesia during monitored anesthesia care (MAC). This study was designed to determine the optimal infusion rates of propofol and alfentanil when administered during local anesthesia. In this randomized, double-blind study, we evaluated the effects of different propofol infusion rates on the alfentanil requirement, level of sedation, intraoperative recall, respiratory and cardiovascular variables, and recovery. Seventy-two consenting ASA physical status I or II female outpatients undergoing breast biopsy procedures with local anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. All patients received midazolam, 2 mg intravenously (I.V.) for premedication. Propofol was infused at 0, 25, 50, or 75 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) during the operation. Sedation was evaluated using the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale at 5-min intervals by a blinded observer. Two minutes before the infiltration of the local anesthetic solution, a bolus of alfentanil, 2.5 microg/kg I.V., was administered, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). The alfentanil infusion rate was subsequently varied to maintain patient comfort and stable cardiovascular and respiratory function. Pictures were shown at the start of the propofol infusion, upon initiating the alfentanil infusion, and at 45 min after the skin incision to evaluate recall of intraoperative events. Propofol produced dose-dependent increases in the level of sedation (with median OAA/S scores of 2-4, P < 0.05). Higher infusion rates of propofol (50-75 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) produced significant amnesia, opioid-sparing effects (alfentanil 0.3 +/- 0.2 vs 0.6 +/- 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), and less postoperative nausea and vomiting (P < 0.05). However, episodes of transient hemoglobin oxygen desaturation were more common in the deeply sedated patients. Thus, in healthy outpatients premedicated with midazolam, 2 mg I.V., a propofol infusion of 25-50 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) in combination with an alfentanil infusion of 0.2-0.4 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) is recommended for sedation and analgesia during MAC in the ambulatory setting.
Implications: Sedation is often given during local anesthesia. This study demonstrated that administration of an intravenous anesthetic, propofol, in combination with an opioid infusion (i.e., alfentanil) to provide sedation analgesia and amnesia with a low incidence of side effects, such as nausea and vomiting and respiratory depression in outpatients premedicated with midazolam.
Similar articles
-
Interactions between midazolam and remifentanil during monitored anesthesia care.Anesthesiology. 1996 Dec;85(6):1283-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199612000-00009. Anesthesiology. 1996. PMID: 8968175 Clinical Trial.
-
The use of midazolam and small-dose ketamine for sedation and analgesia during local anesthesia.Anesth Analg. 2001 Nov;93(5):1174-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200111000-00023. Anesth Analg. 2001. PMID: 11682390 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of analgesics during propofol sedation: a comparison of ketorolac, dezocine, and fentanyl.J Clin Anesth. 1995 Sep;7(6):481-5. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00058-p. J Clin Anesth. 1995. PMID: 8534465 Clinical Trial.
-
Fospropofol, a new sedative anesthetic, and its utility in the perioperative period.Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(38):6241-52. doi: 10.2174/138161212803832308. Curr Pharm Des. 2012. PMID: 22762463 Review.
-
Remimazolam - current knowledge on a new intravenous benzodiazepine anesthetic agent.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug;75(4):307-315. doi: 10.4097/kja.22297. Epub 2022 May 19. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022. PMID: 35585830 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Dexmedetomidine is effective for monitored anesthesia care in outpatients undergoing cataract surgery.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Dec;61(6):453-9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.6.453. Epub 2011 Dec 20. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011. PMID: 22220220 Free PMC article.
-
The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Nov;63(5):431-5. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.5.431. Epub 2012 Nov 16. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012. PMID: 23198037 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced Recovery After Aesthetic Breast Surgery Under Sedation, Intercostal Block and Tumescent Anaesthesia: A Prospective Cohort Study of the Early Postoperative Phase.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Jun;47(3):979-997. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03214-w. Epub 2022 Dec 21. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 36544050 Free PMC article.
-
Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil vs propofol-remifentanil for monitored anesthesia care during hysteroscopy: Randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22712. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022712. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 33120766 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Moderate sedation by total intravenous remimazolam-alfentanil vs. propofol-alfentanil for third molar extraction: A prospective randomized controlled trial.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 2;9:950564. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.950564. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36117971 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous