Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Part 1. Analysis of 248 unscreened patients--medical and functional prognostic indicators
- PMID: 929650
- DOI: 10.1161/01.str.8.6.651
Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Part 1. Analysis of 248 unscreened patients--medical and functional prognostic indicators
Abstract
A retrospective analysis of 248 patients with stroke (average age 67, range 17-98) admitted to a stroke rehabilitation unit over a sixteen month period showed that 80% of these patients were able to return home after an average length of stay (LOS) of 43 days. At discharge 85% of the group were ambulatory and 56% required no help in daily living activities. Severity of weakness on admission, long onset-admission intervals, the presence of severe perceptual or cognitive dysfunction or a homonymous hemianopsia in addition to a motor deficit were related to unfavorable outcome and increased LOS. The age of the patient, dysphasia or a hemisensory deficit in addition to weakness, or diabetes, hypertension, or ASHD were unrelated to the patients' functional status on discharge, discharge disposition, or LOS. Many patients with "unfavorable prognostic signs" made significant improvement after admission and were subsequently discharges. Thus, while the above findings may predict which patients can make maximal gains in a short term treatment facility, they also show that most patients, even those with "poor prognostic signs," can make enough functional improvement to be managed at home after a relatively short hospitalization.
Similar articles
-
Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Part 2. Comparison of 318 screened and 248 unscreened patients.Stroke. 1977 Nov-Dec;8(6):657-62. doi: 10.1161/01.str.8.6.657. Stroke. 1977. PMID: 929651 No abstract available.
-
Stroke rehabilitation--is age a determinant?J Am Geriatr Soc. 1980 Nov;28(11):499-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1980.tb01129.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1980. PMID: 7430523
-
Racial/ethnic differences in FIM scores and length of stay for underinsured patients undergoing stroke inpatient rehabilitation.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 May;85(5):415-23. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000214320.99729.f3. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006. PMID: 16628148
-
[Rehabilitation of stroke patients. Possibilities, duration and effect].Nord Med. 1991;106(12):333-5, 339. Nord Med. 1991. PMID: 1762897 Review. Danish.
-
Assessment for rehabilitation after stroke.Ann Acad Med Singap. 1988 Apr;17(2):267-74. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1988. PMID: 3044266 Review.
Cited by
-
Characterization of hospitalized ischemic stroke patients in palestine.Libyan J Med. 2009 Mar 1;4(1):37-40. doi: 10.4176/080920. Libyan J Med. 2009. PMID: 21483501 Free PMC article.
-
Who goes home? Predictive factors in stroke recovery.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985 Jan;48(1):1-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.48.1.1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985. PMID: 3973617 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of post-stroke hypertension. A practical guide.Drugs Aging. 1996 Jun;8(6):408-15. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199608060-00002. Drugs Aging. 1996. PMID: 8736624 Review.
-
Nursing home reimbursement and the allocation of rehabilitation therapy resources.Health Serv Res. 1988 Oct;23(4):467-93. Health Serv Res. 1988. PMID: 3141313 Free PMC article.
-
Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Sep 7;9:65. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-65. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012. PMID: 22953989 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources