Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997;70(3):173-9.
doi: 10.1007/s004200050203.

Reference values of urinary chromium in Italy

Affiliations

Reference values of urinary chromium in Italy

P Apostoli et al. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1997.

Abstract

Objectives: The paper describes the results of a polycentric study for the assessment of reference values of urinary chromium (U-Cr) in the Italian population.

Method: A total of 890 subjects (58.3% males and 41.7% females) were selected on the basis of standardized criteria in eight different areas of Italy. Urinary chromium was determined on morning spot samples collected using standardized procedures. The U-Cr was determined independently by three laboratories using an Electrothermic atomization-Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (ETA-AAS) method with a detection limit of 0.05 microgram/l, adopting-for the statistical analysis-the median value of the results of the three laboratories. The between-laboratories within-subjects standard deviation was 0.049 microgram/l. Due to the high proportion (approx, 28%) of undetectable chromium levels, the geometric mean (GM) and geometric standard deviation (GSD) were estimated using a procedure of linear interpolation. The analysis of the effects of some variables (sex, age, center, residence, smoking and drinking habits) on the U-Cr values, was also performed, by multiple regression analysis after logarithmic transformation, using GM and SD.

Results: The reference value of U-Cr was of 0.08 microgram/l as an estimated GM, whereas the expected distribution ranged from not detectable (nd) (95% CI = nd-0.06) to 0.24 microgram/l (95th percentile; 95% CI = 0.20-0.31). Among the variables studied, only geographical area and sex significantly influenced the U-Cr levels. In subjects selected in the provinces of Bari and Venice values of U-Cr were significantly lower than those determined in subjects residing in other areas.

Conclusions: From our investigation the reference values for U-Cr were lower than those obtained in previous investigations. In addition it confirms a further reduction in U-Cr levels following the previous decline reported in the 1970s and 1980s. In over 20 years U-Cr values in the general population dropped from values greater than 1 microgram/l to values between 0.5 and 0.2 microgram/l. The reasons of this progressive decline cannot be attributed in our opinion to a reduced intake of the metal, but mainly to the improvement in analytical instrumentation and methods. A further decrease may be ascribed to a more accurate definition of the reference groups and to a better control of pre-analytical factors. Considering that the reference values for U-Cr are much lower than those determined some decades ago, toxicological studies in order to verify the significance of biological limit values currently suggested for chromium seem to be necessary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources