Otorhinolaryngological training in Europe--a comparative study

Abstract

Postgraduate training in the United Kingdom is undergoing radical changes following the 'Calman Report'. Commissioned in response to a European Union (EU) Directive, this contained recommendations to allow reciprocal recognition of all EU trained specialists. We present the findings of a postal questionnaire sent to representatives of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies and the otolaryngology professors of the UK and Ireland with a response rate of 62.7%. Aspects assessed included clinical and surgical experience, examinations, teaching, research, length, regulation and perception of training. The programmes share similar teaching and research experience but substantial differences exist in most other areas. The accredited UK trainee has a much wider clinical and surgical repertoire than those from the Continent. Greek trainees were trained to the lowest minimum standard. The requirements of a training system are largely determined by the level of clinical experience and surgical skill required by an independent specialist in a given country.