Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Sep;50(10):848-53.

[Clinical results of left ventricular free wall rupture following acute myocardial infarction]

[Article in Japanese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 9301180

[Clinical results of left ventricular free wall rupture following acute myocardial infarction]

[Article in Japanese]
G Yaginuma et al. Kyobu Geka. 1997 Sep.

Abstract

We studied 19 cases of Left Ventricular Free Wall Rupture (LVFWR) following acute myocardial infarction, admitted to our CCU between 1987 and 1996. We were able to treat 15 patients and diagnosed 4 cases as LVFWR at postmortem after sudden deaths. Of the treated 15 patients, 11 survived: 1 out of 2 repaired under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), 5 out of 7 repaired without CPB, and 5 out of 6 non-surgically treated. Although the survival rate for those able to be treated was 73%, overall rate was 58%. There were 7 cases of blow-out type: 4 of which were sudden deaths, and 3 were operated. Thoracotomy and direct closure of rupture without CPB was done at bed-side in 2 cases. Even though hemostasis was successful, they did not survive. The 3rd case survived with the patch closure under CPB. In this case, the circulation was maintained pre-operatively with the pericardial-central venous bypass drainage method. This method seems to be extremely effective in saving blow-out cases. There were 12 subacute patients. Although 2 cases were lost, total of 10 patients were saved, including 2 direct suture closures of rupture without CPB, 3 median sternotomy and fibrin-glue fixations, 1 where only pericardial drainage was done, and 4 in whom percutaneous intrapericardial fibrin-glue fixation therapy was utilized. Since the risk of secondary damage to the fragile infarcted are from direct suturing of ruptured myocardium exists in LVFWR, we changed to the Infarction Exclusion Technique under CPB during surgical repair, based on our experiences with ruptured intraventricular septum. In general, the only treatment believed to be available for LVFWR has been surgical. However, our experiences suggest that other treatments may also be effective. If the best suitable method could be chosen from various therapies, it may contribute to improving outcome statistics. The reduction of left ventricular pressure in the treatment is extremely important, being the key to improving survival rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances