Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device
- PMID: 9301441
- DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00039-7
Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the early and late complications rate of central venous access ports connected to the Groshong catheter for long-term chemotherapy delivering. All patients suffering from a neoplastic disease, who required long-term chemotherapy and underwent insertion of implantable ports during a 21-month period (1 October 1994-30 June 1996) were prospectively studied. A single type of port was used, constructed of titanium and silicone rubber (Dome Port, Bard Inc., Salt Lake City, U.S.A), connected to an 8 F silastic Groshong catheter tubing (Bard Inc.). A team of different operators (two general surgeons, one interventional radiologist and four anaesthesiologists) was involved in inserting the port. All devices were placed in the operating room under fluoroscopic control. A central venous access form was filled in by the operator after the procedure and all ports were followed prospectively for device-related and overall complications. Data from the follow-up of these patients were entered in the form and collected in a database. Follow-up continued until the device was removed, the patient died or the study was closed. 178 devices, comprising a total of 32,089 days in situ, were placed in 175 patients. Three patients received a second device after removal of the first. Adequate follow-up was obtained in all cases (median 180 days, range 4-559). 138 devices (77.5%) were still in situ when the study was closed. Early complications included six pneumothoraxes, three arterial punctures and two revisions for port and/or catheter malfunction (overall early complications in 8 patients). Late complications included 3 cases (1.68% of devices) of catheter rupture and embolisation (0.093 episodes/1000 days of use), 2 cases (1.12% of devices) of venous thrombosis (0.062 episodes/1000 days of use), 1 case (0.56% of devices) of pocket infection (0.031 episodes/1000 days of use), and 4 cases (2.24% of devices) of port-related bacteraemias (0.124 episodes/1000 days of use). Infections were caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus (4 cases) and Bacillus subtilis (1 case); they required port removal in 3 out of 5 cases. This study represents the largest published series of patients with totally implantable access ports connected to Groshong catheters; this device is a good option for long-term access to central veins and delivery of chemotherapeutic regimens, including continuous intravenous infusions. The low incidence of major complications related to implantation and management of these devices support increased use in oncology patients.
Comment in
-
Vascular access devices in cancer patients: towards the next step.Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jul;33(8):1171-2. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00073-7. Eur J Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9301437 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.Ann Oncol. 1998 Jul;9(7):767-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1008392423469. Ann Oncol. 1998. PMID: 9739444
-
Totally implantable ports connected to valved catheters for chemotherapy: experience from 350 Groshong devices.J Vasc Access. 2010 Jan-Mar;11(1):17-22. doi: 10.1177/112972981001100104. J Vasc Access. 2010. PMID: 20119917
-
A randomized, prospective trial of central venous ports connected to standard open-ended or Groshong catheters in adult oncology patients.Cancer. 2001 Sep 1;92(5):1204-12. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1204::aid-cncr1439>3.0.co;2-9. Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11571734 Clinical Trial.
-
Infection of totally implantable venous access devices: A review of the literature.J Vasc Access. 2018 May;19(3):230-242. doi: 10.1177/1129729818758999. Epub 2018 Mar 7. J Vasc Access. 2018. PMID: 29512430 Review.
-
A peripherally implanted permanent central venous access device.Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;78(6):1138-42. Obstet Gynecol. 1991. PMID: 1945224 Review.
Cited by
-
Catheter Fracture of Subclavian Venous Chemoport Device at Costoclavicular Junction: Pinch-off Syndrome.Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;9(4):595-597. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0802-2. Epub 2018 Jul 30. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30538396 Free PMC article.
-
Increased rates of local complication of central venous catheters in the targeted anticancer therapy era: a 2-year retrospective analysis.Support Care Cancer. 2015 May;23(5):1295-302. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2466-y. Epub 2014 Oct 19. Support Care Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25326782
-
A randomized trial of valved vs nonvalved implantable ports for vascular access.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2003 Oct;16(4):384-7. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2003.11927932. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2003. PMID: 16278752 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and risk factors of infectious complications related to implantable venous-access ports.Korean J Radiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;15(4):494-500. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.4.494. Epub 2014 Jul 9. Korean J Radiol. 2014. PMID: 25053910 Free PMC article.
-
A case of percutaneous retrieval of a catheter without a free end that was fractured during a totally implantable venous access port removal.Radiol Case Rep. 2023 Jun 16;18(9):2911-2917. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.05.046. eCollection 2023 Sep. Radiol Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37383179 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources