Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997;27(8):696-701.
doi: 10.1007/BF02384979.

Jejunal pouch and interposition reconstruction after total gastrectomy for cancer

Affiliations

Jejunal pouch and interposition reconstruction after total gastrectomy for cancer

Y Nakane et al. Surg Today. 1997.

Abstract

The authors modified the operative procedures used in pouch and interposition (PI) reconstruction in an attempt to improve the surgical results after total gastrectomy, because a randomized controlled trial had revealed that the clinical assessment of PI was quite poor, even though it is a physiological route. In most of the treated patients, the gastric emptying test revealed delayed emptying, and an X-ray video film showed folding and twisting of the jejunal conduit between the pouch and duodenum, which disturbed the transmission of nutrition. Modified PI (m-PI) was performed by decreasing the length of the jejunal conduit and widening the mesenteric pedicle to preserve the blood and nerve supply. This procedure was retrospectively compared with the previously used PI reconstruction by evaluating the postprandial symptoms, food intake, body weight, serum nutritional parameters, and emptying time of the gastric substitute. The m-PI group (n = 6) showed a lower incidence of symptoms, a greater food intake, and a greater weight recovery than the PI group (n = 6). The gastric emptying test also revealed an acceptable degree of emptying. We thus conclude that the m-PI reconstruction is more useful for improving the postoperative quality of life than the previously used method of PI reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ital J Surg Sci. 1985;15(2):139-44 - PubMed
    1. AMA Arch Surg. 1952 May;64(5):601-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1962 Jan;103:15-7 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 1987 Dec;11(6):689-98 - PubMed
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1951 Apr;92(4):456-65 - PubMed