The aortic homograft: evolution of indications, techniques, and results in 107 patients

Abstract

Background: Homograft aortic valve replacement has been performed in 107 patients during the past 7 years. Two primary methods of implantation were used (intraaortic and root replacement). Results of both methods are presented.

Methods: Intraaortic implantation (subcoronary or cylinder technique) was performed in 36 patients (mean age, 54 years) for aortic stenosis or regurgitation (31 patients) and endocarditis (5 patients). Aortic root replacement was performed in 71 patients (mean age, 62 years). The majority (58 patients) had complex root pathologies such as ascending aneurysm, dissection, or prosthetic endocarditis with annular destruction. Early results were assessed with intraoperative or predischarge echocardiography; annual echocardiograms provided long-term follow-up. Left ventricular mass was calculated in patients with long-standing pathology for whom preoperative and postoperative data were available.

Results: Early valvular insufficiency was documented in 16 of the 36 intraaortic implants (44%); 9 of these have had progression of the insufficiency. Of the 20 patients who had trivial or no early insufficiency, significant insufficiency has developed in 7 and mild insufficiency has developed in 5. Calculation of left ventricular mass revealed a mean reduction of 11% at 1 year. There has been no mortality, endocarditis, or homograft-related reoperation in the intraaortic group with a mean follow-up of 50 months. The root replacement group had a hospital mortality of 17%. The cardiac pathology was limited to the aortic valve in 12 patients; mortality in this subset was zero. There has been no significant early or late postoperative valvular insufficiency in the 59 surviving patients. More rapid left ventricular mass reduction was seen in this group with a 26% mean reduction within 1 year. A mean follow-up of 32 months in the root replacement group has seen no homograft-related reoperations.

Conclusions: Although the lack of early mortality in the intraaortic group makes this technique appealing, the high incidence of early insufficiency with the realistic expectation of progression has led to our abandonment of the intraaortic technique. Homograft aortic root replacement confers a higher mortality based on the severity of aortic pathology, but offers excellent long-term hemodynamics in any patient. We have expanded our indication for homograft root replacement to include patients with isolated valvular disease rather than reserving it for those patients with extensive root pathology.