Differential catalytic efficiency and enantioselectivity of murine glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes in the glutathione conjugation of carcinogenic anti-diol epoxides of chrysene and benzo(g)chrysene
- PMID: 9308905
- DOI: 10.1006/abbi.1997.0270
Differential catalytic efficiency and enantioselectivity of murine glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes in the glutathione conjugation of carcinogenic anti-diol epoxides of chrysene and benzo(g)chrysene
Abstract
The kinetics of the conjugation of carcinogenic anti-diol epoxides of chrysene (anti-CDE) and benzo(g)chrysene [anti-B(g)CDE] with glutathione (GSH) catalyzed by GSH S-transferase (GST) isoenzymes mGSTP1-1, mGSTM1-1, mGSTA3-3, mGSTA4-4, and GST 9.5 of female A/J mouse tissues has been investigated. When GST activity was measured as a function of varying anti-CDE or anti-B(g)-CDE concentrations at a fixed concentration of GSH, each isoenzyme obeyed Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The catalytic efficiencies (k(cat)/Km) of murine GSTs in the GSH conjugation of anti-CDE were in the order of GST 9.5 > mGSTP1-1 > mGSTM1-1 > mGSTA3-3 > mGSTA4-4. While each GST isoenzyme examined in the present study exhibited preference for the GSH conjugation of (+)-anti-CDE with the (R,S)-diol (S,R)-epoxide absolute configuration, which is a far more potent carcinogen than the (-)-anti-CDE [(S,R)-diol (R,S)-epoxide absolute configuration], the enantioselectivity was relatively more pronounced for mGSTP1-1 compared with other murine GSTs. Anti-B(g)CDE was a relatively poor substrate for each GST isoenzyme examined compared with anti-CDE. The catalytic efficiencies of murine GSTs in the GSH conjugation of anti-B(g)CDE were in the order of GST 9.5 > mGSTP1-1 > mGSTM1-1 > mGSTA3-3. With the exception of mGSTM1-1, all other murine GSTs exhibited preference for the GSH conjugation of anti-B(g)CDE enantiomer with the (R,S)-diol (S,R)-epoxide absolute configuration. In summary, the results of the present study indicate that the murine GSTs significantly differ in their catalytic efficiency and enantioselectivity in the GSH conjugation of both anti-CDE and anti-B(g)CDE, and that anti-B(g)CDE is a relatively poor substrate for murine GSTs compared with anti-CDE, which may partially account for the observed relatively higher carcinogenic potency of the former compound.
Similar articles
-
Differential enantioselectivity of murine glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes in the glutathione conjugation of trans-3,4-dihydroxy-1, 2-oxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[c]phenanthrene stereoisomers.Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998 Oct 1;358(1):40-8. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1998.0840. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998. PMID: 9750162
-
Mechanism of differential catalytic efficiency of two polymorphic forms of human glutathione S-transferase P1-1 in the glutathione conjugation of carcinogenic diol epoxide of chrysene.Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997 Sep 1;345(1):32-8. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1997.0269. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997. PMID: 9281308
-
Specificity of murine glutathione S-transferase isozymes in the glutathione conjugation of (-)-anti- and (+)-syn-stereoisomers of benzo[g]chrysene 11,12-diol 13,14-epoxide.Carcinogenesis. 1999 Oct;20(10):1997-2001. doi: 10.1093/carcin/20.10.1997. Carcinogenesis. 1999. PMID: 10506116
-
Human glutathione S-transferases.Semin Liver Dis. 1998;18(4):345-58. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1007169. Semin Liver Dis. 1998. PMID: 9875553 Review.
-
[Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs)].Nihon Rinsho. 1995 May;53(5):1253-9. Nihon Rinsho. 1995. PMID: 7602788 Review. Japanese.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous