Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Aug;61(2):439-48.
doi: 10.1086/514860.

Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families

Affiliations

Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families

E R Martin et al. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Aug.

Abstract

The transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) originally was introduced to test for linkage between a genetic marker and a disease-susceptibility locus, in the presence of association. Recently, the TDT has been used to test for association in the presence of linkage. The motivation for this is that linkage analysis typically identifies large candidate regions, and further refinement is necessary before a search for the disease gene is begun, on the molecular level. Evidence of association and linkage may indicate which markers in the region are closest to a disease locus. As a test of linkage, transmissions from heterozygous parents to all of their affected children can be included in the TDT; however, the TDT is a valid chi2 test of association only if transmissions to unrelated affected children are used in the analysis. If the sample contains independent nuclear families with multiple affected children, then one procedure that has been used to test for association is to select randomly a single affected child from each sibship and to apply the TDT to those data. As an alternative, we propose two statistics that use data from all of the affected children. The statistics give valid chi2 tests of the null hypothesis of no association or no linkage and generally are more powerful than the TDT with a single, randomly chosen, affected child from each family.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Mar;52(3):506-16 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Nov;59(5):983-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Sep;59(3):731-6 - PubMed
    1. Nat Genet. 1995 Jan;9(1):80-5 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances