[Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab]
- PMID: 9312820
[Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab]
Abstract
Cervical smears should contain endocervical cells to be accepted as representative for a cytologic diagnosis. In this prospective study with 200 women we compared cytologic specimens obtained by Cervex-Brush (100 women) or by conventional cotton-swab (100 women) technique. The incidence of smears containing cylindrical and metaplastic cells was 85% in the Cervex-Brush group and only 58% in the cotton-swab group. We believe that the application of the Cervex-Brush or a similar instrument should result in fewer repeat smears and fewer false-negative smears and thus in an improvement of the cervical cytology.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.Acta Cytol. 1989 Nov-Dec;33(6):849-51. Acta Cytol. 1989. PMID: 2588918 Clinical Trial.
-
[Cytobrush quality assurance in endocervical smears].Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1991 Jan;51(1):51-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1026332. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1991. PMID: 2026300 German.
-
Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.Acta Cytol. 1993 Nov-Dec;37(6):876-8. Acta Cytol. 1993. PMID: 8249505 Clinical Trial.
-
[Cytological classifications of vaginal smears. Current concepts of complex cytodiagnosis].Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1984;23(4):357-64. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1984. PMID: 6385754 Review. Bulgarian. No abstract available.
-
News in der aktuell gültigen WHO-Klassifikation der HPV-assoziierten Zervix-Läsionen.Praxis (Bern 1994). 2017;106(6):305-310. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a002623. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2017. PMID: 28300000 Review. German. No abstract available.