Randomized trial of the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to faecal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasia population screening
- PMID: 9313712
Randomized trial of the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to faecal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasia population screening
Abstract
Background: Published data suggest that screening might reduce the mortality rate from colorectal neoplasia. Faecal occult blood (FOB) testing suffers from poor sensitivity and significant numbers of interval cancers, both of which should be improved by the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FOS).
Methods: This prospective, randomized study aimed to assess the compliance and neoplasia yield of FOB testing and FOS compared with that of FOB testing alone. From general practitioner registers, 6371 asymptomatic patients (3124 men, 3247 women; age range 50-74 years) were invited for screening by means of FOB testing (3128 patients) performed at home, or a combination of FOB testing and FOS (3243 patients).
Results: Compliance with FOB testing alone was 50 per cent. In the FOB testing/FOS group, 48 per cent returned the FOB test but only 20 per cent went on to FOS. Despite the poor compliance, the neoplasia yield was four times greater in the FOB testing/FOS group.
Conclusion: FOS increase the neoplasia yield but strategies to improve compliance must be identified for this to become a population screening test.
Similar articles
-
Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing: a French population-based controlled study (Wintzenheim trial).Eur J Cancer. 2009 Dec;45(18):3282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.06.015. Epub 2009 Aug 6. Eur J Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19665368
-
[Evaluation of usefulness of faecal occult blood test. Prospective screening study in patients with colorectal neoplasia].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2004 Dec;17(102):579-82. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2004. PMID: 15771126 Polish.
-
Evaluation of the occult blood test in screening for colorectal neoplasms. A prospective study using flexible endoscopy.Am Surg. 1990 Mar;56(3):119-23. Am Surg. 1990. PMID: 2316930
-
[Mass screening for colorectal cancer].Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1996;44 Suppl 1:S7-14. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1996. PMID: 8935859 Review. French.
-
[Evaluation of various screening and surveillance methods in colorectal carcinoma].Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1998 Jun 20;128(25):999-1011. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1998. PMID: 9691335 Review. German.
Cited by
-
[Colorectal cancer in Germany. Means for prevention and early detection: implications for laiety and physicians].Internist (Berl). 2003 Mar;44(3):278, 281-6. Internist (Berl). 2003. PMID: 12731414 German. No abstract available.
-
Colorectal cancer screening: tests, strategies, and perspectives.Front Public Health. 2014 Oct 27;2:210. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00210. eCollection 2014. Front Public Health. 2014. PMID: 25386553 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost effectiveness analysis of three colorectal cancer screening modalities in Kuwait.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 1;15(1):7354. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91119-4. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40025065 Free PMC article.
-
Protagonist: population based endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.Gut. 2003 Mar;52(3):321-2. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.3.321. Gut. 2003. PMID: 12584209 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Single-round performance of colorectal cancer screening programs: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.BMC Med. 2025 Feb 21;23(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03948-9. BMC Med. 2025. PMID: 39985068 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical