Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1997 Sep;84(9):1274-6.

Randomized trial of the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to faecal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasia population screening

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9313712
Clinical Trial

Randomized trial of the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to faecal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasia population screening

D P Berry et al. Br J Surg. 1997 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Published data suggest that screening might reduce the mortality rate from colorectal neoplasia. Faecal occult blood (FOB) testing suffers from poor sensitivity and significant numbers of interval cancers, both of which should be improved by the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FOS).

Methods: This prospective, randomized study aimed to assess the compliance and neoplasia yield of FOB testing and FOS compared with that of FOB testing alone. From general practitioner registers, 6371 asymptomatic patients (3124 men, 3247 women; age range 50-74 years) were invited for screening by means of FOB testing (3128 patients) performed at home, or a combination of FOB testing and FOS (3243 patients).

Results: Compliance with FOB testing alone was 50 per cent. In the FOB testing/FOS group, 48 per cent returned the FOB test but only 20 per cent went on to FOS. Despite the poor compliance, the neoplasia yield was four times greater in the FOB testing/FOS group.

Conclusion: FOS increase the neoplasia yield but strategies to improve compliance must be identified for this to become a population screening test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources