Is bracing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction necessary? A 2-year follow-up of 78 consecutive patients rehabilitated with or without a brace
- PMID: 9335027
- DOI: 10.1007/s001670050044
Is bracing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction necessary? A 2-year follow-up of 78 consecutive patients rehabilitated with or without a brace
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a standard postoperative rehabilitation knee brace on function, stability and postoperative complications at the 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery. Seventy-eight consecutive patients with a unilateral chronic ACL rupture reconstructed by the same surgeon using the endoscopic "all-inside" technique, patellar tendon autograft and interference screw fixation were included in the study. The rehabilitation followed a standard protocol. Group A included 39 patients who were supplied postoperatively with a knee brace for 4 (range 3-6) weeks. Group B included 39 patients for whom a brace was not used. The median age was 27 (range 16-48) years in group A and 26 (range 14-51) years in group B. The median time period between the injury and the index operation was 24 (range 3-150) months in group A and 18 (range 3-360) months in group B. All 78 patients were re-examined by two independent observers after a median follow-up period of 25 (range 23-28) months in group A and 24 (range 22-27) months in group B. The median KT-1000 total side-to-side difference between the reconstructed and the uninjured knees at 89 N was 3 (range -5.5-11) mm in group A and 3 (range -7-10) mm in group B (NS). When the anterior translation was tested separately at 89 N, the corresponding values were 3 (range -4-13) mm in group A and 3 (range -5-10) mm in group B (NS). The median one-leg hop quotient was 95% (range 50%-167%) of the uninjured leg in group A and 92% (range 64%-119%) in group B (NS). The median Lysholm score was 89 (range 39-100) points in group A and 85 (range 37-100) points in group B (NS). In group A, 27/39 (69%) patients and in group B 21/39 (54%) patients were classified as excellent or good (NS). The median Tegner activity level was 7 (range 3-9) in group A and 6 (range 3-9) in group B (NS). Using the IKDC scale, 27/39 (69%) in group A and 24/39 (62%) in group B were classified as normal or nearly normal (NS). The median sick leave in group A was 62 (range 0-357) days and 59 (range 0-243) days in group B (NS). No serious complications occurred during the first 6 postoperative weeks. Two serious complications were, however, registered after the 6th postoperative week. One patient in group A sustained a rupture of the reconstructed ACL 8 weeks postoperatively (3 weeks after removing the brace), and one patient in group B sustained an undislocated patellar fracture during the 7th postoperative week after a fall. This study indicates that the use of a postoperative rehabilitation brace after an arthroscopic ACL reconstruction did not appear to influence either objective stability or subjective function by the 2-year follow-up.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A follow-up of 527 patients.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(3):160-5. doi: 10.1007/s001670050141. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999. PMID: 10401652 Clinical Trial.
-
Complications following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 2-5-year follow-up of 604 patients with special emphasis on anterior knee pain.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(1):2-8. doi: 10.1007/s001670050112. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999. PMID: 10024955
-
Outcome and risk factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a follow-up study of 948 patients.Arthroscopy. 2005 Aug;21(8):958-64. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.007. Arthroscopy. 2005. PMID: 16084293
-
The effect of knee bracing on the knee function and stability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Oct;105(6):1107-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Jul 3. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31279767
-
[To brace or not to brace? How effective are knee braces in rehabilitation?].Orthopade. 1999 Jun;28(6):565-70. doi: 10.1007/PL00003642. Orthopade. 1999. PMID: 10431312 Review. German.
Cited by
-
A comparison of the clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft with special emphasis on the timing of the reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Mar;19(3):488-94. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1312-0. Epub 2010 Nov 10. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011. PMID: 21063680
-
Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone-patellar-tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Sep;17(9):1117-24. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0846-5. Epub 2009 Jul 3. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009. PMID: 19575180 Clinical Trial.
-
Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation-A Randomised Controlled Trial.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 6;12(5):2074. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052074. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902868 Free PMC article.
-
Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation.Sports Med. 2004;34(4):269-80. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434040-00006. Sports Med. 2004. PMID: 15049718
-
A prospective comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in female patients.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Mar;14(3):278-86. doi: 10.1007/s00167-005-0708-8. Epub 2005 Nov 16. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006. PMID: 16292682 Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous