Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Oct;40(10):1228-32.
doi: 10.1007/BF02055169.

Long-term results of suture rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with incomplete rectal prolapse

Affiliations

Long-term results of suture rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with incomplete rectal prolapse

J W Briel et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Oct.

Abstract

Suture rectopexy is the recommended therapy for complete rectal prolapse that is associated with fecal incontinence. It has been suggested that correction of an incomplete rectal prolapse is also worthwhile for patients with fecal incontinence.

Purpose: Aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the clinical outcome of suture rectopexy in a consecutive series of patients with incomplete rectal prolapse associated with fecal incontinence, and 2) to compare these results with those obtained from patients with complete rectal prolapse.

Methods: Between 1979 and 1994, suture rectopexy was performed in 13 incontinent patients (3 males; median age, 65 (range, 45-77) years) with incomplete rectal prolapse (Group I) and in 24 incontinent patients (21 females; median age, 71 (range, 24-86) years) with complete rectal prolapse (Group II).

Results: After a median follow-up of 67 months, continence was restored in 5 of 13 (38 percent) patients with incomplete rectal prolapse and in 16 of 24 (67 percent) patients with complete rectal prolapse. In both groups, all male patients became continent.

Conclusions: For the majority of incontinent patients with incomplete rectal prolapse, a suture rectopexy is not beneficial. The clinical outcome of this procedure is only good in incontinent patients with complete rectal prolapse. Based on these data, it is questionable whether incomplete rectal prolapse plays a causative role in fecal incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse.
    Shin EJ. Shin EJ. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011 Feb;27(1):5-12. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.1.5. Epub 2011 Feb 28. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011. PMID: 21431090 Free PMC article.
  • Single port laparoscopic mesh rectopexy.
    Ahmed GM. Ahmed GM. Prz Gastroenterol. 2016;11(2):123-6. doi: 10.5114/pg.2016.57617. Epub 2016 Feb 2. Prz Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27350840 Free PMC article.
  • Anorectal Disease.
    Huber P Jr, Gregorcyk S. Huber P Jr, et al. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2000 Jun;3(3):229-242. doi: 10.1007/s11938-000-0026-7. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2000. PMID: 11097740
  • A single centre comparative study of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus suture rectopexy.
    Sahoo MR, Thimmegowda AK, Gowda MS. Sahoo MR, et al. J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Jan;10(1):18-22. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.124456. J Minim Access Surg. 2014. PMID: 24501504 Free PMC article.
  • Rectal prolapse.
    Goldstein SD, Maxwell PJ 4th. Goldstein SD, et al. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011 Mar;24(1):39-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1272822. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011. PMID: 22379404 Free PMC article.

LinkOut - more resources