[Is SnorEx also ApneaEx? A study with a new intra-oral prosthesis as a form of therapy of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome]

Abstract

In recent years different kinds of dental devices have been advocated for treating sleep apnoea. In this study we report on our results with a kind of prosthesis ("Snor-Ex", DEPITA, 29336 Nienhagen) designed to relieve upper airway obstruction in sleep in pulling forward the tongue by a truss pad positioned in the posterior area of the tongue. We performed the study to test the effectiveness of the device in reducing the number of obstructive events.

Patients: 23 patients with OSA (22 male, age: 53.7 +/- 8.6 years, Body mass index: 31.1 +/- 3.9 kg/m2, Apnoea index: 33.5 +/- 18.4, Respiratory disturbance index: 45.6 +/- 19.7, mean apnoea duration: 20.4 +/- 4.4 sec) were included.

Study design: Before the study was started, polysomnography was performed and the OSA associated symptoms/claims were standardised with the help of visual analogue scales (VAS). The prosthesis were made by the dental laboratory. Between the 28th and 42nd day after beginning with the study the patients had to come to the hospital for control. The effect of the therapy was documented only by a further polysomnography in patients who could sleep for at least 2.5 hours with the prosthesis. The effects of the device on changing OSA-associated symptoms and snoring were reevaluated by the above mentioned VAS. During the control the patients were divided into non-responders (NR) and responders (R) according to the results.

Results: The NR prevail in the study with 75% (17/23). They are characterised by inacceptable loco-regional side effects of the prosthesis, missing improvement of the state of daytime wellbeing and constant obstructive events. Only 25% of the patients are R. They locally tolerated the prosthesis, which is the precondition for long-term therapy. The severity of OSA diminished. Snoring also diminished significantly.

Conclusion: According to our results the insufficient acceptance and the low effectivity of the SnorEx-prosthesis preclude large-scale indication for OSA patients. The prosthesis should not be prescribed without contacting a sleep lab.