Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1997 Oct;63(4):468-73.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.63.4.468.

Effects of antipsychotic medication on electromyographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in schizophrenia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effects of antipsychotic medication on electromyographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in schizophrenia

N J Davey et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of antidopaminergic antipsychotic medication on the electromyographic (EMG) responses of thenar muscles to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex in schizophrenic patients.

Methods: A group of nine drug naive schizophrenic patients was compared with a group of nine schizophrenic patients established on neuroleptic medication. Surface EMG recordings were made from the thenar muscles while patients maintained a weak isometric voluntary contraction. TMS was applied using a 9 cm circular stimulating coil centred over the vertex. The EMG responses to up to 50 magnetic stimuli were rectified and averaged.

Results: There was no difference in threshold TMS strength for eliciting compound motor evoked potentials (cMEPs), or in their latency, in drug naive and medicated patients. In some patients the silent period (SP) was clearly made up of two parts and the percentage of control levels of voluntary EMG was measured in each component. During the early component of the SP there was a weaker (P<0.05) suppression of EMG in the medicated patients (mean 73.9 (SEM) 5.5% of control levels) compared with the drug naive patients (54.7 (SEM) 7.3% of control levels). This resulted in the latency of maximum suppression of voluntary EMG being longer (P<0.05) in the medicated patients (38.3 (2.4) ms) than in the drug naive patients (28.2 (0.7) ms). During the late component of the SP voluntary EMG was reduced to similar levels (P>0.05) in both medicated (48.2 (7.7)% of control levels) and drug naive (58 (7.8)% of control levels) patients.

Conclusion: The results are discussed with reference to the disrupted inhibition seen in the early part of the SP in Parkinson's disease and drug induced parkinsonism. The future uses of motor responses to TMS as a marker for the status of antipsychotic medication are considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Comp Neurol. 1975 Mar 15;160(2):205-67 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1976 Apr 30;192(4238):481-3 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1976 Jun 24;261(5562):717-9 - PubMed
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1978 Aug;45(2):302-4 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1984 Aug 31;225(4665):954-7 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances