Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Oct;26(5):296-9.

Carcinoma of the tonsil: prognostic factors

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9343766

Carcinoma of the tonsil: prognostic factors

S al-Abdulwahed et al. J Otolaryngol. 1997 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to provide a review of the prognostic factors of tonsillar carcinoma.

Design: A retrospective analysis.

Setting/patients: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil, treated in Northern Alberta, at the Cross Cancer Institute from 1975 to 1995 were analyzed using a population-based, head and neck cancer registry. There were 102 patients, 73 male and 29 female, ranging in age from 35 years to 83 years, with a mean of 60 years. The clinical stages were T1: 5 patients; T2: 27 patients, T3: 33 patients; T4: 11 patients; and Tx: 3 patients. The nodal stages were N0: 33 patients, N1: 26 patients; N2: 34 patients, N3: 7 patients; Nx: 2 patients.

Method: The patients were treated with various modalities: surgery alone: 2 patients; surgery plus radiation: 26 patients; radiation treatment alone: 61 patients; and others: 13 patients. Patients were classified according to the UICC TNM 1992 criteria. The overall 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival in our series was 39%. The cause-specific 4-year survival was 57%. Various prognostic factors and their impact on survival were studied.

Results: On univariate analysis, the following factors were found to be significant. Age < 50 vs. > 50 (p = .02); endophytic growth pattern vs. exophytic growth of the primary (p = .01); ulcerated lesions vs. nonulcerated lesions (p = .000); various T stages (p = .003); clinical extension vs. no extension of primary disease (p = .02); combined modality of treatment (surgery and radiation treatment) had the best chance of survival compared to radiation treatment alone (p = .03). Nodal stages N0 vs. N+ disease (p = .2); sex of the patient, female vs. male (p = .83); and dose of radiation treatment < 5000 cGy vs. > 5000 cGy (p = .41) were found not to be significant. When the above significant factors were stratified according to the stage of the disease, only two were significant; ulcerated lesions vs. nonulcerated lesions (p = .04), and the modality of treatment chosen (e.g., radiation alone vs. radiation plus surgery) (p = .02).

Conclusions: In this series of patients, combined-modity approach using surgery and radiation treatment was found to be the best way to treat carcinoma of the tonsil. However, each treatment strategy should be individualized taking into account various prognostic factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by