Chances of cure are not compromised with sphincter-saving procedures for cancer of the lower third of the rectum
- PMID: 9347856
- DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90087-8
Chances of cure are not compromised with sphincter-saving procedures for cancer of the lower third of the rectum
Abstract
Background: The goal of this study was to compare patterns of recurrence and long-term outcome after sphincter-saving procedures (SSPs) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in patients with tumors located in the lower third of the rectum.
Methods: We reviewed the charts of 1001 patients operated on for primary rectal adenocarcinoma between 1980 and 1991. All patients with tumors located between 5 and 7 cm from the anal verge and treated with curative intent were included.
Results: Of the 261 patients who met our criteria, 162 had undergone SSP and 99 had undergone APR. The local recurrence rates for SSP and APR were 8% and 11%, respectively (p = 0.41), and the distant metastases rates were 23% and 28%, respectively (p = 0.35). Recurrence and distant metastases rates for SSP and APR, respectively, did not differ by TNM classification: state I, 10% versus 9% (p = 0.9); stage II, 25% versus 43% (p = 0.13); and stage III, 56% versus 57% (p = 0.92). Five-year disease-free survival rates for SSP and APR patients were 70.5% and 62.3%, respectively (p = 0.2).
Conclusions: Tumors in the lower third of the rectum can be treated with sphincter-saving procedures without compromising the chance of cure.
Similar articles
-
Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum.Ann Surg. 1998 Jun;227(6):800-11. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199806000-00003. Ann Surg. 1998. PMID: 9637543 Free PMC article.
-
First thousand rectal cancer cases--local recurrence and survival.Acta Chir Iugosl. 2004;51(2):133-7. doi: 10.2298/aci0402133k. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2004. PMID: 15771305
-
Middle and lower third rectum carcinoma: sphincter saving or abdominoperineal resection?Eur J Surg Oncol. 1995 Jun;21(3):265-8. doi: 10.1016/s0748-7983(95)91393-9. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1995. PMID: 7781794
-
Is there still a place for abdominoperineal resection of the rectum?Eur J Surg Oncol. 1995 Feb;21(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/s0748-7983(05)80060-5. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1995. PMID: 7851543 Review.
-
Morbidity and mortality following abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.Rev Invest Clin. 2001 Sep-Oct;53(5):388-95. Rev Invest Clin. 2001. PMID: 11795103 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of the pathologist in rectal cancer diagnosis and staging and surgical quality assessment.Clin Transl Oncol. 2010 May;12(5):339-45. doi: 10.1007/s12094-010-0515-7. Clin Transl Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20466618 Review.
-
Perineal colostomy: an alternative to avoid permanent abdominal colostomy: operative technique, results and reflection.Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014 Nov-Dec;27(4):243-6. doi: 10.1590/S0102-67202014000400004. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014. PMID: 25626931 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative radiotherapy improves survival for patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for stage T3 low rectal cancers.Ann Surg. 2002 Aug;236(2):203-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200208000-00008. Ann Surg. 2002. PMID: 12170025 Free PMC article.
-
Management of rectal cancer.J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Feb;8(2):139-49. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.10.011. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004. PMID: 15036189 Review. No abstract available.
-
Neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: the impact of longer interval between chemoradiation and surgery.J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Mar;15(3):444-50. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1197-8. Epub 2010 Dec 8. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011. PMID: 21140237
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous