Are sheep spines a valid biomechanical model for human spines?
- PMID: 9355217
- DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199710150-00009
Are sheep spines a valid biomechanical model for human spines?
Abstract
Study design: Range of motion, neutral zone, and stiffness parameters of the complete cervical, thoracic, and lumbar sheep spine were determined in flexion and extension, axial left/right rotation, and right/left lateral bending.
Objectives: To determine quantitative biomechanical properties of the sheep spine and compare them with those from the human spine.
Summary of background data: Sheep spines often serve as a model for experimental in vivo and in vitro studies in spine research, but few quantitative biomechanical data from sheep spines for comparison with human specimens are available.
Methods: Complete spines were sectioned into single-joint segments and tested in a spine tester under pure moments in the three main anatomic planes.
Results: The craniocaudal variation in range of motion in all load directions was qualitatively similar between sheep spines and values reported in the literature for human specimens.
Conclusions: Based on the biomechanical similarities of sheep and human spines demonstrated in this study, it appears that the use of the sheep spine, which already includes evaluation of surgical techniques and bone healing processes, might be extended to spinal implants.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the complete porcine spine in comparison with data of the human spine.Eur Spine J. 2011 Nov;20(11):1859-68. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1822-6. Epub 2011 Jun 11. Eur Spine J. 2011. PMID: 21674213 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 May 1;26(9):1028-37. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200105010-00008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001. PMID: 11337621
-
In vitro biomechanical characteristics of the spine: a comparison between human and porcine spinal segments.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jan 15;35(2):E35-42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b21885. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. PMID: 20081499
-
Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the kangaroo spine in comparison with human spinal data.J Anat. 2023 Jul;243(1):128-137. doi: 10.1111/joa.13852. Epub 2023 Mar 17. J Anat. 2023. PMID: 36929138 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How Does the Rib Cage Affect the Biomechanical Properties of the Thoracic Spine? A Systematic Literature Review.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jun 15;10:904539. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.904539. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 35782518 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Prosthesis Based on the Physiological Curvature of Endplate for Cervical Disc Replacement.PLoS One. 2016 Jun 29;11(6):e0158234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158234. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27355319 Free PMC article.
-
A novel sheep vertebral bone defect model for injectable bioactive vertebral augmentation materials.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011 Jan;22(1):159-64. doi: 10.1007/s10856-010-4191-5. Epub 2010 Dec 3. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011. PMID: 21127948
-
Biomechanical Stability of a Cross-Rod Connection with a Pedicle Screw System.Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2018 Jan 26;24:26-30. doi: 10.12659/msmbr.906339. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2018. PMID: 29371585 Free PMC article.
-
Restoration of physiologic loading after engineered disc implantation mitigates immobilization-induced facet joint and paraspinal muscle degeneration.Acta Biomater. 2025 Jan 15;192:128-139. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.12.014. Epub 2024 Dec 9. Acta Biomater. 2025. PMID: 39653318
-
Thoracic spine morphology of a pseudo-biped animal model (kangaroo) and comparisons with human and quadruped animals.Eur Spine J. 2016 Dec;25(12):4140-4154. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4776-x. Epub 2016 Oct 4. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 27704284
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials