Assessment of atrioventricular junction ablation and DDDR mode-switching pacemaker versus pharmacological treatment in patients with severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled study
- PMID: 9355902
- DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.96.8.2617
Assessment of atrioventricular junction ablation and DDDR mode-switching pacemaker versus pharmacological treatment in patients with severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled study
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of AV junction ablation and pacemaker implantation on quality of life and specific symptoms in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) not controlled by drugs.
Methods and results: We performed a multicenter, randomized, 6-month evaluation of the clinical effects of AV junction ablation and DDDR mode-switching pacemaker (Abl+Pm) versus pharmacological treatment in 43 patients with intolerable, recurrent paroxysmal AF of three or more episodes in the previous 6 months not controlled with three or more antiarrhythmic drugs. Before completion of the study, 3 patients in the drug group withdrew because of the severity of their symptoms and 1 patient assigned to the Abl+Pm group in whom the ablation procedure failed. At the end of the 6 months, the 21 patients of the Abl+Pm group who completed the study showed, in comparison with the 18 of the drug group, lower scores in the Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (-51%, P=.0006), palpitations (-71%, P=.0000), effort dyspnea (-36%, P=.04), exercise intolerance score (-46%, P=.001), and easy fatigue (-51%, P=.02). The scores for rest dyspnea, chest discomfort, and NYHA functional classification were also lower (-56%, -50%, and -17%, respectively) in the Abl+Pm group, although not significantly. At the end of the study, palpitations were no longer present in 81% of the Abl+Pm group and in 11% of the drug group (P=.0000). AF was documented in 31 of 122 visits (25%) in the Abl+Pm group and in 9 of 107 examinations (8%) in the drug group (P=.0005); chronic AF developed in 5 (24%) and 0 (0%) in the two groups, respectively (P=.04).
Conclusions: In patients with paroxysmal AF not controlled by pharmacological therapy, Abl+Pm treatment is highly effective and superior to drug therapy in controlling symptoms and improving quality of life. The discontinuation of drug therapy exposes patients to further recurrences of paroxysmal AF and the risk of developing permanent AF.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of atrioventricular junction ablation and VVIR pacemaker versus pharmacological treatment in patients with heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation: a randomized, controlled study.Circulation. 1998 Sep 8;98(10):953-60. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.10.953. Circulation. 1998. PMID: 9737514 Clinical Trial.
-
Prospective, randomized study of atrioventricular ablation and mode-switching, dual chamber pacemaker implantation versus medical therapy in drug-resistant paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The PAF study. Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.Europace. 1999 Jan;1(1):15-9. doi: 10.1053/eupc.1998.0007. Europace. 1999. PMID: 11220531 Clinical Trial.
-
Ventricular performance and quality of life in patients who underwent radiofrequency AV junction ablation and permanent pacemaker implantation due to medically refractory atrial tachyarrhythmias.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1998 Mar;2(1):71-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1009721008761. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1998. PMID: 9869999
-
Atrioventricular nodal ablation and pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation.Am J Cardiol. 1999 Mar 11;83(5B):241D-245D. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)01036-4. Am J Cardiol. 1999. PMID: 10089872 Review.
-
Quality of life evidence in the management of the individual patient with atrial fibrillation.Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Jan;7(1):60-2. doi: 10.1023/a:1023647208382. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003. PMID: 12766521 Review.
Cited by
-
Selective atrionodal input ablation for induction of proximal complete heart block with stable junctional escape rhythm in patients with uncontrolled atrial fibrillation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb;8(1):49-57. doi: 10.1023/a:1022344032001. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003. PMID: 12652178
-
The AFFIRM trial: main trial and substudies-what can We expect?J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000 Jan;4 Suppl 1:171-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1009815606734. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000. PMID: 10590505 Review.
-
New approaches to atrial fibrillation management: a critical review of a rapidly evolving field.Drugs. 2002;62(16):2377-97. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262160-00005. Drugs. 2002. PMID: 12396229 Review.
-
Atrial fibrillation in the elderly.Drugs Aging. 2013 Aug;30(8):593-601. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0094-8. Drugs Aging. 2013. PMID: 23709402 Review.
-
Trials of pacing to control ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2004;10 Suppl 1:63-70. doi: 10.1023/B:JICE.0000011347.53684.55. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2004. PMID: 14739741 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous