Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Nov 11;94(23):12442-5.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12442.

Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura

Affiliations

Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura

C R Boake et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

If behavioral isolation between species can evolve as a consequence of sexual selection within a species, then traits that are both sexually selected and used as a criterion of species recognition by females should be identifiable. The broad male head of the Hawaiian picture-winged fly Drosophila heteroneura is a novel sexual dimorphism that may be sexually selected and involved in behavioral isolation from D. silvestris. We found that males with broad heads are more successful in sexual selection, both through female mate choice and through aggressive interactions. However, female D. heteroneura do not discriminate against hybrids on the basis of their head width. Thus, this novel trait is sexually selected but is not a major contributor to species recognition. Our methods should be applicable to other species in which behavioral isolation is a factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Associations between head width and sexually selected behavior within D. heteroneura. (A) Courtship success. The univariate regression line is provided to illustrate the relationship. In this and the next graph, some points represent more than one subject. (B) Aggressive success. The line illustrates equal sizes of winners and losers. In three cases, the head width of the winner and loser were the same. In one case, the winner was smaller than the loser; in this pair, the losing male had a large blob of paint on his eye. Using a likelihood ratio test, the probability of no association between head width and winning fights is 0.007, and the probability of no association between size and winning fights is 0.89.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coyne J A. Nature (London) 1992;355:511–515. - PubMed
    1. Lande R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78:3721–3725. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lande R, Kirkpatrick M. J Theor Biol. 1988;133:85–98. - PubMed
    1. Turner G F, Burrows M T. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1995;260:287–292.
    1. Paterson H E H. In: Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Vrba E S, editor. Pretoria, South Africa: Transvaal Museum; 1985. pp. 21–29.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources