Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Nov;38(5):852-7.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910380524.

Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays

C D Constantinides  1 , E Atalar, E R McVeigh
Affiliations

Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays

C D Constantinides et al. Magn Reson Med. 1997 Nov.

Erratum in

  • Magn Reson Med. 2004 Jul;52(1):219

Abstract

A method is proposed to estimate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values in phased array magnitude images, based on a region-of-interest (ROI) analysis. It is shown that the SNR can be found by correcting the measured signal intensity for the noise bias effects and by evaluating the noise variance as the mean square value of all the pixel intensities in a chosen background ROI, divided by twice the number of receivers used. Estimated SNR values are shown to vary spatially within a bound of 20% with respect to the true SNR values as a result of noise correlations between receivers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
The chi distribution of Mn/σ for several values of An/σ for a (a) single-receiver system, (b) two-receiver system, and (c) four-receiver system.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
(a) The measured SNR (M−n∕σ) and (b) the normalized standard deviation (σMn/σ) plots for a magnitude sum-of-squares image obtained using single-, two-, and four-receiver systems, for several values of An/σ, in a uniform region of the image.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
Correction plots in sum-of-squares magnitude images for single-, two-, and four-receiver systems as a function of M−n∕σ Corrected SNR values were obtained by subtracting the appropriate correction factor from M−n∕σ.
FIG. 4
FIG. 4
(a), (b) Midaxial and midcoronal images of a cylindrical water phantom generated by dividing the calculated SNR values by the true SNR values in the case of a (a) two-receiver and a (b) four-receiver system. The background intensities in both images were suppressed using a thresholding algorithm. (c), (d) Profiles taken along the midline of each of the images in (a) and (b) above.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Henkelman RM. Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. Med. Phys. 1984;12:232–233. Erratum in 13, 544 (1986) - PubMed
    1. Henkelman RM, Bronskill MJ. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Rev. of Magn. Reson. Med. 1987;2(1)
    1. Bernstein MA, Thomasson DM, Perman WH. Improved detectability in low signal-to-noise ratio magnetic resonance images by means of a phase-corrected real reconstruction. Med. Phys. 1989;15(5):813–817. - PubMed
    1. Miller AJ, Joseph PM. The use of power images to perform quantitative analysis on low SNR images. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 1993;11:1051–1056. - PubMed
    1. McGibney G, Smith MR. An unbiased signal-to-noise ratio measure for magnetic resonance images. Med. Phys. 1993;20(4):1077–1078. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms