Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis
- PMID: 9361611
Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis
Abstract
Background: Functional outcome after rectal excision with coloanal anastomosis is improved by construction of a colonic J pouch. Present prospective randomized studies lack follow-up beyond 1 year. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome at both short- and long-term follow-up.
Methods: Forty patients with low rectal cancer were randomized prospectively to either J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis or a straight coloanal anastomosis. Clinical assessments were performed 3, 12 and 24 months after colostomy closure using a standard questionnaire and physical examination.
Results: There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups. There was a significant (P < 0.01) improvement in frequency of defaecation at 3, 12 and 24 months for patients with a reservoir. Similarly, fragmentation (clustering of stools) was significantly less at 3 and 12 months (P < 0.01) in the reservoir group, and incontinence occurred less frequently in the first year (P = 0.09). By 24 months no patient in either group suffered from major or minor incontinence.
Conclusion: The functional improvement gained from a colonic reservoir in coloanal anastomosis continues to benefit the patient for at least 2 years.
Similar articles
-
[Comparison of colonic J-pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 8 randomized trails].Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2002 Dec;40(12):905-8. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2002. PMID: 12654206 Chinese.
-
Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch.Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Nov;48(11):2100-8; discussion 2108-10. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0139-0. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005. PMID: 16132480 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of functional and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colonic J-pouch versus straight reconstruction after total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Jul;14(7):1972-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9355-2. Epub 2007 Apr 13. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17431725 Clinical Trial.
-
[Colo-anal pouch after total rectum resection].Zentralbl Chir. 1994;119(12):878-85. Zentralbl Chir. 1994. PMID: 7846970 Review. German.
-
Use of a colonic pouch as a rectal substitute after rectal excision.Arq Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr-Jun;36(2):99-104. Arq Gastroenterol. 1999. PMID: 10511890 Review.
Cited by
-
Modern management of rectal cancer: a 2006 update.World J Gastroenterol. 2006 May 28;12(20):3186-95. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i20.3186. World J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 16718838 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: randomized controlled trial.World J Surg. 2001 Jul;25(7):876-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0044-1. World J Surg. 2001. PMID: 11572027 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of neo-rectal wall properties on functional outcome after colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;22(11):1353-60. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0326-7. Epub 2007 May 23. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007. PMID: 17520264 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristic findings on defecography according to reconstruction method and defecatory disorder following sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Sep;23(9):883-92. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0485-1. Epub 2008 May 29. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008. PMID: 18509660
-
[Reconstructive surgery after anterior resection of the rectum].Chirurg. 2004 Jan;75(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0760-1. Chirurg. 2004. PMID: 14740122 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources