Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Nov;8(11):2217-31.
doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.11.2217.

Polymer models of meiotic and mitotic chromosomes

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Polymer models of meiotic and mitotic chromosomes

J F Marko et al. Mol Biol Cell. 1997 Nov.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Polymers tied together by constraints exhibit an internal pressure; this idea is used to analyze physical properties of the bottle-brush-like chromosomes of meiotic prophase that consist of polymer-like flexible chromatin loops, attached to a central axis. Using a minimal number of experimental parameters, semiquantitative predictions are made for the bending rigidity, radius, and axial tension of such brushes, and the repulsion acting between brushes whose bristles are forced to overlap. The retraction of lampbrush loops when the nascent transcripts are stripped away, the oval shape of diplotene bivalents between chiasmata, and the rigidity of pachytene chromosomes are all manifestations of chromatin pressure. This two-phase (chromatin plus buffer) picture that suffices for meiotic chromosomes has to be supplemented by a third constituent, a chromatin glue to understand mitotic chromosomes, and explain how condensation can drive the resolution of entanglements. This process resembles a thermal annealing in that a parameter (the affinity of the glue for chromatin and/or the affinity of the chromatin for buffer) has to be tuned to achieve optimal results. Mechanical measurements to characterize this protein-chromatin matrix are proposed. Finally, the propensity for even slightly chemically dissimilar polymers to phase separate (cluster like with like) can explain the apparent segregation of the chromatin into A + T- and G + C-rich regions revealed by chromosome banding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An isolated chromatin bristle will be a random coil (left), but when attached to an axis and spaced by << R, interchain repulsion stretches it (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chromatin pressure develops when the bristles are compressed, either when two brushes overlap (left) or when a brush is bent (right). Arrows indicate forces.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Two sister chromatids undergoing condensation and resolution. Interdigitated interchromatid loops will be under slightly more tension than the intrachromatid loops defining the arm. Bars represent condensing (possibly SMC) proteins.

References

    1. Belmont AS, Braunfeld MB, Sedat JW, Agard DA. Large-scale chromatin structural domains within mitotic and interphase chromosomes in vivo and in vitro. Chromosoma. 1989;98:129–143. - PubMed
    1. Bickel SE, Orr-Weaver TL. Holding chromatids together to ensure they go their separate ways. Bioessays. 1996;18:293–300. - PubMed
    1. Boy de la Tour E, Laemmli UK. The metaphase scaffold is helically folded: sister chromatids have predominantly opposite helical handedness. Cell. 1988;55:937–944. - PubMed
    1. Bradbury EM. Reversible histone modifications and the chromosome cell cycle. Bioessays. 1992;1:9–16. - PubMed
    1. Callan HG. Lampbrush chromosomes. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1981;214:417–448. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources