Treadmill testing for evaluation of claudication: comparison of constant-load and graded-exercise tests

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the correlation and practicability of single-stage vs. graded treadmill protocols in the assessment of the absolute claudication distance (ACD).

Design: Randomized open study.

Material and methods: In 52 patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease, the ACD on treadmill at 3 km/h and 12% grade (constant-load test = C-test) ranged form 50 to 400 m. The C-test and the graded-exercise test (walking on the treadmill at 3 km/h and 0% gradient for 3 min, with subsequent increase in gradient of 3.5% every 3 min = G-test) were carried out at random on the same day under standardized conditions.

Results: The ACD was higher in the G-test than in the C-test (360.4 +/- 208.8m vs. 166.5 +/- 93.6m; p < 0.001). The coefficients of variation were very similar (57.9% and 56.2%, respectively). In the subgroup of patients with an ACD of between 100 m and 150 m, a large difference was found both for the coefficient of variation (58.6% G-test, 9.6% C-test) and for the standard deviation (339.8 +/- 199.0m and 133.1 +/- 12.8m, respectively).

Conclusions: For the assessment of the ACD in patients with severe claudication the C-test would seem to be more suitable than the G-test.