Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Nov 5;112(5):1304-9.
doi: 10.1378/chest.112.5.1304.

Multimodality treatment of esophageal disruptions

Affiliations

Multimodality treatment of esophageal disruptions

L Kotsis et al. Chest. .

Abstract

The treatment of esophageal disruptions has changed since 1981. The value of a more selective assessment in six spontaneous ruptures and 30 mostly intrathoracic (83.4%) esophageal perforations is evaluated in this study. Based on the previous state of the esophagus, the time factor, and type and site of the disruption, reinforced primary repair (by diaphragmatic, muscular, pleural flap, or fundoplication), transhiatal closure, resection, intubation, suture combined with myotomy and fundoplication, esophageal diversion, and transhiatal mediastinal drainage were employed. The overall 30-day hospital mortality was 19.4%. Although these operations were mostly used in late (24 h to 7 months) perforations and ruptures, none of the patients with reinforced repair by autogenous diaphragmatic, muscular, or pleural flaps or fundoplication had fatal outcome for breakdown of the closure. Only patients with renal, cardiac, or multiorgan failure as a consequence of sepsis due to time elapsed before hospital admission died. The key to improve the prognosis of this life-threatening emergency is the more appropriate selection of the primary employed procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources