Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 1997 Nov;133(11):1423-5.

Screening for skin cancer in primary care settings

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9371027
Multicenter Study

Screening for skin cancer in primary care settings

D G Federman et al. Arch Dermatol. 1997 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the frequency of recorded screening for skin cancer in primary care settings.

Design: Retrospective observational cohort study.

Setting: Two academically affiliated Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

Subjects: Two hundred randomly selected patients at least 50 years old and receiving care at outpatient medical clinics.

Main outcome measure: Frequency of documented skin examinations, in comparison with other tests routinely done as screening, during a 2-year period.

Methods: Medical record review to identify how often selected components of the physical examination and specific procedures were documented during ambulatory visits.

Results: Among the 200 subjects, the frequency of documented examinations and procedures included fecal occult blood testing in 120 (60%), rectal examination in 128 (64%), and sigmoidoscopy in 93 (47%), prostate examination was performed in 114 (59%) of 193 men. In contrast, skin examination was documented in only 56 (28%) of 200 subjects (P < .001 for each comparison with other tests). As an estimate of the "true" frequency of screening for skin cancer, 35 (18%) of 165 patients without skin-related complaints had a documented skin examination.

Conclusion: Skin cancer screening is infrequently documented and therefore possibly omitted in the context of primary care visits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types