Manual interception of moving targets. I. Performance and movement initiation
- PMID: 9372290
- DOI: 10.1007/pl00005769
Manual interception of moving targets. I. Performance and movement initiation
Abstract
We investigated the capacities of human subjects to intercept moving targets in a two-dimensional (2D) space. Subjects were instructed to intercept moving targets on a computer screen using a cursor controlled by an articulated 2D manipulandum. A target was presented in 1 of 18 combinations of three acceleration types (constant acceleration, constant deceleration, and constant velocity) and six target motion times, from 0.5 to 2.0 s. First, subjects held the cursor in a start zone located at the bottom of the screen along the vertical meridian. After a pseudorandom hold period, the target appeared in the lower left or right corner of the screen and traveled at 45 degrees toward an interception zone located on the vertical meridian 12.5 cm above the start zone. For a trial to be considered successful, the subject's cursor had to enter the interception zone within 100 ms of the target's arrival at the center of the interception zone and stay inside a slightly larger hold zone. Trials in which the cursor arrived more than 100 ms before the target were classified as "early errors," whereas trials in which the cursor arrived more than 100 ms after the target were classified as "late errors." Given the criteria above, the task proved to be difficult for the subjects. Only 41.3% (1080 out of 2614) of the movements were successful, whereas the remaining 58.7% were temporal (i.e., early or late) errors. A large majority of the early errors occurred in trials with decelerating targets, and their percentage tended to increase with longer target motion times. In contrast, late errors occurred in relation to all three target acceleration types, and their percentage tended to decrease with longer target motion times. Three models of movement initiation were investigated. First, the threshold-distance model, originally proposed for optokinetic eye movements to constant-velocity visual stimuli, maintains that response time is composed of two parts, a constant processing time and the time required for the stimulus to travel a threshold distance. This model only partially fit our data. Second, the threshold-tau model, originally proposed as a strategy for movement initiation, assumes that the subject uses the first-order estimate of time-to-contact (tau) to determine when to initiate the interception movement. Similar to the threshold distance model, the threshold-tau model only partially fit the data. Finally, a dual-strategy model was developed which allowed for the adoption of either of the two strategies for movement initiation; namely, a strategy based on the threshold-distance model ("reactive" strategy) and another based on the threshold-tau model ("predictive" strategy). This model provided a good fit to the data. In fact, individual subjects preferred to use one or the other strategy. This preference was allowed to be manifested at long target motion times, whereas shorter target motion times (i.e., 0.5 s and 0.8 s) forced the subjects to use only the reactive strategy.
Similar articles
-
Intercepting real and path-guided apparent motion targets.Exp Brain Res. 1996 Jul;110(2):298-307. doi: 10.1007/BF00228560. Exp Brain Res. 1996. PMID: 8836693
-
Intercepting accelerated moving targets: effects of practice on movement performance.Exp Brain Res. 2017 Apr;235(4):1257-1268. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4895-6. Epub 2017 Feb 14. Exp Brain Res. 2017. PMID: 28197673 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Manual interception of moving targets. II. On-line control of overlapping submovements.Exp Brain Res. 1997 Oct;116(3):421-33. doi: 10.1007/pl00005770. Exp Brain Res. 1997. PMID: 9372291 Clinical Trial.
-
Motor cortical activity during interception of moving targets.J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Apr 1;13(3):306-18. doi: 10.1162/08989290151137368. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001. PMID: 11371309
-
Continuously updating one's predictions underlies successful interception.J Neurophysiol. 2018 Dec 1;120(6):3257-3274. doi: 10.1152/jn.00517.2018. Epub 2018 Oct 31. J Neurophysiol. 2018. PMID: 30379633 Review.
Cited by
-
Controlling reaching movements with predictable and unpredictable target motion in 10-year-old children and adults.Exp Brain Res. 2007 Mar;177(4):483-92. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0704-3. Epub 2006 Sep 28. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17006685
-
Judging where a ball will go: the case of curved free kicks in football.Naturwissenschaften. 2006 Feb;93(2):97-101. doi: 10.1007/s00114-005-0071-0. Epub 2006 Feb 1. Naturwissenschaften. 2006. PMID: 16450083
-
Position, direction of movement, and speed tuning of cerebellar Purkinje cells during circular manual tracking in monkey.J Neurosci. 2005 Oct 5;25(40):9244-57. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1886-05.2005. J Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 16207884 Free PMC article.
-
Movement and perceptual strategies to intercept virtual sound sources.Front Neurosci. 2015 May 6;9:149. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00149. eCollection 2015. Front Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 25999805 Free PMC article.
-
Catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories.PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049381. Epub 2012 Nov 14. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23166653 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources