Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding
- PMID: 9373986
- DOI: 10.1121/1.420354
Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding
Abstract
Normally hearing listeners were presented with vowels, consonants, and sentences for identification through an acoustic simulation of a five-channel cochlear implant with electrodes separated by 4 mm (as in the Ineraid implant). The aim of the experiment was to simulate the effect of depth of electrode insertion on identification accuracy. Insertion depth was simulated by outputting sine waves from each channel of the processor at a frequency determined by the cochlear place of electrodes inserted 22-25 mm into the cochlea. The results indicate that simulated insertion depth had a significant effect on performance. Performance at 22- and 23-mm simulated insertion depths was always poorer than normal, and performance at 25 mm simulated insertion depth was, most generally, the same as normal. It is inferred from these results that, if insertion depth could be unconfounded from other coexisting factors in implant patients, then insertion depth would be found to affect speech identification performance significantly.
Similar articles
-
Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Apr;113(4 Pt 1):2064-76. doi: 10.1121/1.1558357. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003. PMID: 12703717
-
Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception.Audiol Neurootol. 2004 May-Jun;9(3):163-72. doi: 10.1159/000077267. Audiol Neurootol. 2004. PMID: 15084821
-
Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping.J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Mar;117(3 Pt 1):1405-16. doi: 10.1121/1.1856273. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005. PMID: 15807028
-
Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):411-27. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182064bda. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21248642 Review.
-
Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants.Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 22. Hear Res. 2015. PMID: 25456089 Review.
Cited by
-
Spectral and temporal analysis of simulated dead regions in cochlear implants.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Apr;16(2):285-307. doi: 10.1007/s10162-014-0502-8. Epub 2015 Mar 5. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 25740402 Free PMC article.
-
Electrode Location and Audiologic Performance After Cochlear Implantation: A Comparative Study Between Nucleus CI422 and CI512 Electrode Arrays.Otol Neurotol. 2016 Sep;37(8):1032-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001140. Otol Neurotol. 2016. PMID: 27525618 Free PMC article.
-
[Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing].HNO. 2005 Sep;53(9):753-5. doi: 10.1007/s00106-005-1320-4. HNO. 2005. PMID: 16132875 German. No abstract available.
-
Estimating the reduced benefit of infant-directed speech in cochlear implant-related speech processing.Neurosci Res. 2021 Oct;171:49-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 20. Neurosci Res. 2021. PMID: 33484749 Free PMC article.
-
The Sound Quality of Cochlear Implants: Studies With Single-sided Deaf Patients.Otol Neurotol. 2017 Sep;38(8):e268-e273. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001449. Otol Neurotol. 2017. PMID: 28806337 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical