Mesothelioma in Quebec chrysotile miners and millers: epidemiology and aetiology
- PMID: 9375529
- DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4878(97)00020-3
Mesothelioma in Quebec chrysotile miners and millers: epidemiology and aetiology
Abstract
In a cohort of some 11,000 men born 1891-1920 and employed in the Quebec chrysotile production industry, including a small asbestos products factory, of 9780 men who survived into 1936, 8009 are known to have died before 1993, 38 probably from mesothelioma--33 in miners and millers and five in factory workers. Among the 5041 miners and millers at Thetford Mines, there had been 4125 deaths from all causes, including 25 (0.61%) from mesothelioma, a rate of 33.7 per 100,000 subject-years; the corresponding figures for the 4031 men at Asbestos were eight out of 3331 (0.24%, or 13.2 per 100,000 subject-years). At the factory in Asbestos, where all 708 employees were potentially exposed to crocidolite and/or amosite, there were 553 deaths, of which five (0.90%) were due to mesothelioma; the rate of 46.2 per 100,000 subject-years was 3.5 times higher than among the local miners and millers. Six of the 33 cases in miners and millers were in men employed from 2 to 5 years and who might have been exposed to asbestos elsewhere; otherwise, the 22 cases at Thetford were in men employed 20 years or more and the five at Asbestos for at least 30 years. The cases at Thetford were more common in miners than in millers, whereas those at. Asbestos were all in millers. Within Thetford Mines, case-referent analyses showed a substantially increased risk associated with years of employment in a circumscribed group of five mines (Area A), but not in a peripherally distributed group of ten mines (Area B); nor was the risk related to years employed at Asbestos, either at the mine and mill or at the factory. There was no indication that risks were affected by the level of dust exposure. A similar pattern in the prevalence of pleural calcification had been observed at Thetford Mines in the 1970s. These geographical differences, both within the Thetford region and between it and Asbestos, suggest that the explanation is mineralogical. Lung tissue analyses showed that the concentration of tremolite fibres was much higher in Area A than in Area B, a finding compatible with geological knowledge of the region. These findings, probably related to the far greater biopersistence of amphibole fibres than chrysotile, have important implications in the control of asbestos related disease and for wider aspects of fibre toxicology.
Comment in
-
The quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure.Ann Occup Hyg. 2001 Jun;45(4):327-9; author reply 336-8. Ann Occup Hyg. 2001. PMID: 11414249 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008;38 Suppl 1:1-47. doi: 10.1080/10408440802276167. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18671157
-
Chrysotile, tremolite and carcinogenicity.Ann Occup Hyg. 1997 Dec;41(6):699-705. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4878(97)89350-7. Ann Occup Hyg. 1997. PMID: 9375528
-
The 1891-1920 birth cohort of Quebec chrysotile miners and millers: development from 1904 and mortality to 1992.Ann Occup Hyg. 1997 Jan;41(1):13-36. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4878(96)00044-0. Ann Occup Hyg. 1997. PMID: 9072947
-
An evaluation of the risks of lung cancer and mesothelioma from exposure to amphibole cleavage fragments.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1 Suppl):S154-86. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.09.020. Epub 2007 Oct 22. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008. PMID: 18396365 Review.
-
Mesothelioma and asbestos.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1 Suppl):S223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.10.003. Epub 2007 Oct 11. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008. PMID: 18022298 Review.
Cited by
-
Health risk of chrysotile revisited.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013 Feb;43(2):154-83. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2012.756454. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013. PMID: 23346982 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Applying definitions of "asbestos" to environmental and "low-dose" exposure levels and health effects, particularly malignant mesothelioma.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2011;14(1-4):3-39. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2011.556045. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2011. PMID: 21534084 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Asbestos Exposure and the Mesothelioma Incidence in Poland.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 13;15(8):1741. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081741. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30104558 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative hazards of chrysotile asbestos and its substitutes: A European perspective.Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Aug;107(8):607-11. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107607. Environ Health Perspect. 1999. PMID: 10417355 Free PMC article.
-
Occupational cohort study of current and former workers exposed to chrysotile in mine and processing facilities in Asbest, the Russian Federation: Cohort profile of the Asbest Chrysotile Cohort study.PLoS One. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0236475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236475. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32726334 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical