Complications in spinal cord stimulation for treatment of angina pectoris. Differences in unipolar and multipolar percutaneous inserted electrodes
- PMID: 9381889
Complications in spinal cord stimulation for treatment of angina pectoris. Differences in unipolar and multipolar percutaneous inserted electrodes
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become a well established treatment for ischaemic nociceptive pain condition such as angina pectoris. In patients not suitable candidates for coronary bypass grafting or intraarterial invasive technique (i.e. PTCA and Stent) SCS is an alternative. The purpose was to record the complications: electrode fracture, infection, electrode migration, and technical equipment failure, which occurred during long-term spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Of 60 patients with severe angina pectoris and not candidates for angioplastic or coronary bypass surgery, 22 had monopolar and 38 had quadripolar spinal cord electrodes positioned percutaneously. The patients were followed with 1 to 4 month intervals in a 4 year period, and all complications were recorded. Infection was seen in 5% and electrode fracture was seen in 3% of the patients. The most frequent complication was electrode displacement, which required operation (23%). The incidence of this complication was statistically lower in patients with quadripolar electrodes than in patients with monopolar electrodes (p < 0.003). All displacements occurred within 1 year after implantation. The lower frequency of displacements, which required reoperations, seen among the multipolar electrodes, was due to the possibility of noninvasive changes of electrode combinations to optimize the topography of stimulation. Changes of electrode combination in connection with small migrations were necessary in 29% of the patients with multipolar electrodes. Therefore, there was no significant difference between frequency of migration for patients with monopolar or quadripolar epidural stimulation electrodes (p = 0.31). When SCS was used for treatment of anginal pain, the frequency of electrode tip migrations was high, but the use of multipolar electrodes gave the possibility to compensate for the migration, and to avoid surgical replacement.
Similar articles
-
[Incapacitating angina pectoris treated with electric stimulation of the spinal cord].Ugeskr Laeger. 1992 Apr 20;154(17):1176-9. Ugeskr Laeger. 1992. PMID: 1604745 Danish.
-
[Epidural spinal cord stimulation in therapy-resistant angina pectoris].Anaesthesist. 1993 Aug;42(8):557-63. Anaesthesist. 1993. PMID: 8368477 German.
-
Long-term home treatment with epidural analgesia does not affect later spinal cord stimulation in patients with otherwise intractable angina pectoris.Clin J Pain. 1998 Dec;14(4):315-9. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199812000-00008. Clin J Pain. 1998. PMID: 9874010 Clinical Trial.
-
Spinal cord stimulation for angina pectoris and peripheral vascular disease.Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;21(4):797-804. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8537(03)00090-7. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2003. PMID: 14719720 Review.
-
[Importance of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of refractory angina].Ital Heart J Suppl. 2004 Jun;5(6):429-35. Ital Heart J Suppl. 2004. PMID: 15471147 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Device-Related Complications Associated with Cylindrical Lead Spinal Cord Stimulator Implants: A Comprehensive Review.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Sep;28(9):941-947. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01280-0. Epub 2024 Jun 8. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024. PMID: 38850491 Review.
-
Recovery of control of posture and locomotion after a spinal cord injury: solutions staring us in the face.Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:393-418. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17526-X. Prog Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19660669 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable angina pectoris: a unified theory on its mechanism.Clin Cardiol. 2001 Aug;24(8):533-41. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960240803. Clin Cardiol. 2001. PMID: 11501604 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Large-scale real-world data on a multidisciplinary approach to spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndromes: first evaluation of the Neuro-Pain® nationwide screening and follow-up interactive register.Front Neurosci. 2024 Mar 22;18:1322105. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1322105. eCollection 2024. Front Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38586192 Free PMC article.
-
Biological and hardware-related spinal cord stimulation complications and their management: A single-center retrospective analysis of the implantation of nonrechargeable implantable pulse generators in different pain conditions.Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Nov 8;15:402. doi: 10.25259/SNI_821_2023. eCollection 2024. Surg Neurol Int. 2024. PMID: 39640317 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical