Encouraging underscreened women to have cervical cancer screening: the effectiveness of a computer strategy
- PMID: 9388791
- DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0195
Encouraging underscreened women to have cervical cancer screening: the effectiveness of a computer strategy
Abstract
Background: Computers that collect data from patients and provide both patients and practitioners with printed feedback on a range of health risks are a tool for assisting general practitioners with preventive care. This study assessed the impact of computer-generated printed feedback on cervical screening among women who were underscreened for cervical cancer.
Method: Female attenders at two Australian general practices were randomly allocated to Experimental or Control groups. Women in both groups completed a health risk survey on a touch screen computer prior to their consultation. Those in the Experimental group received printed pages summarizing their results, including their eligibility for cervical screening and last Pap test, for themselves and their doctor. The number and proportion of underscreened women who had a Pap test in the 6 months after completing the computer survey, as determined by pathology records, were examined.
Results: Of the 679 participants, 139 were classified as underscreened on the basis of self-report (74 Experimental, 65 Control) and 272 on the basis of their pathology records (148 Experimental, 124 Control). Overall about one-third of women had a test in the 6-month period, and the differences between the groups were not significant for women overall (18-70 years) or for women 18-49 years. Among women 50-70 who were underscreened based on self-report, those receiving the printout were more likely to have a Pap test in the next 6 months (P < 0.05). This pattern was also evident, but did not reach statistical significance, for older women who were underscreened based on pathology records.
Conclusions: We are unable to draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the computer system due to the modest proportions of women screened, the small numbers, and the fact that the computer survey may have created an intervention effect in the Control group. As the study suggests the computer system is acceptable to women and may be effective for encouraging screening among older women, further exploration of the system is desirable.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.CMAJ. 1997 Sep 1;157(5):521-6. CMAJ. 1997. PMID: 9294390 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Screening for cervical disease in mature women: strategies for improvement.Cancer. 2002 Aug 25;96(4):195-203. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10723. Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12209660
-
Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.East Afr J Public Health. 2008 Aug;5(2):111-6. East Afr J Public Health. 2008. PMID: 19024420
-
Screening patterns for cervical cancer: how best to reach the unscreened population.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1996;(21):7-11. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1996. PMID: 9023823 Review.
-
Cervical cancer screening: are the 1989 recommendations still valid? National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix.CMAJ. 1996 Jun 15;154(12):1847-53. CMAJ. 1996. PMID: 8653644 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Promotion of cancer family history awareness: Jameslink Cancer Risk Assessment Tool at community health fairs.J Genet Couns. 2008 Jun;17(3):274-82. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9146-8. Epub 2008 May 17. J Genet Couns. 2008. PMID: 18484172
-
Review of computer-generated outpatient health behavior interventions: clinical encounters "in absentia".J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Jan-Feb;8(1):62-79. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080062. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001. PMID: 11141513 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0183924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183924. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28873092 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer risk assessment tools in primary care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Ann Fam Med. 2015 Sep;13(5):480-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1837. Ann Fam Med. 2015. PMID: 26371271 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 11;9(9):CD012472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012472.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30204235 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials