Clinical performance of steroid-eluting pacing leads with 1.2-mm2 electrodes
- PMID: 9392811
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb05438.x
Clinical performance of steroid-eluting pacing leads with 1.2-mm2 electrodes
Abstract
To raise pacing impedance and reduce battery current drain, new tined steroid-eluting leads were developed with 1.2-mm2 hemispherical electrodes, instead of conventional 5-8 mm2. Twenty-two unipolar J-shaped atrial leads and 25 unipolar ventricular leads (models 4533 and 4033, respectively) were implanted in 33 consecutive patients and followed for a mean of 25 months (range 18-29). Handling characteristics of atrial leads were found favorable. The leads slipped easily into the right atrial appendage and were easy to position. Handling characteristics of ventricular leads were satisfying, but more efforts had to be applied to cross the tricuspid valve. Special care was taken to avoid perforation of the myocardium due to the small lead tip. Following implantation, four ventricular and one atrial lead exhibited instability of pacing thresholds that resolved spontaneously within 1-3 days of implantation. Except for this, no lead malfunctioned. The reoperation rate was zero. The mean electrogram amplitudes of 15 mV (ventricle) and 4 mV (atrium), and the mean chronic pacing threshold of 0.085 ms at 1.6 V (app. 0.43 V at 0.5 ms) were comparable with the best values seen in the literature on passive fixation leads. The rest of the electrophysiological parameters were enhanced: mean pacing impedances were 984 omega (acute) and 900 Q (chronic), mean slew rates 3.26 V/s (ventricle) and 1.75 V/s (atrium), mean acute voltage threshold at 0.5 ms was 0.25 V, mean current and energy thresholds calculated at 0.5 ms were 260 microA and 32 nJ (acute) and 478 microA and 103 nJ (chronic). The electrical characteristics of these leads provide for increased pacemaker longevity in combination with substantial safety margins for pacing and sensing.
Similar articles
-
Initial experience with 1.5-mm2 high impedance, steroid-eluting pacing electrodes.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Feb;19(2):188-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03310.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996. PMID: 8834688 Clinical Trial.
-
Evolution of an active fixation atrial pacing lead.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov;23(11 Pt 2):1795-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07021.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000. PMID: 11139926 Clinical Trial.
-
Chronic steroid-eluting lead performance: a comparison of atrial and ventricular pacing.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 1):17-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04807.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997. PMID: 9121966
-
Bipolar leads for use with permanently implantable cardiac pacing systems: a review of limitations of traditional and coaxial configurations and the development and testing of new conductor, insulation, and electrode designs.J Invest Surg. 1997 Jan-Apr;10(1-2):1-15. doi: 10.3109/08941939709032119. J Invest Surg. 1997. PMID: 9100169 Review.
-
Efficacy of prophylactic epicardial pacing leads in children and young adults.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jul;78(1):197-202; discussion 202-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.008. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15223427 Review.
Cited by
-
Energy Saving in Permanent Cardiac Pacing: Pulse Waveform and Charge Balancing Deserve Consideration.Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Feb 17;12(2):194. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12020194. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40001713 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical