Double-blind multicenter study comparing alprostadil alpha-cyclodextrin with moxisylyte chlorhydrate in patients with chronic erectile dysfunction
- PMID: 9400450
- DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64030-8
Double-blind multicenter study comparing alprostadil alpha-cyclodextrin with moxisylyte chlorhydrate in patients with chronic erectile dysfunction
Abstract
Purpose: We compared the efficacy and safety of alprostadil alpha-cyclodextrin and moxisylyte chlorhydrate to induce erections adequate for sexual intercourse in a prospective, randomized, parallel double-blind study in patients with erectile dysfunction.
Materials and methods: A total of 156 men with erectile dysfunction due to organic, nonorganic and mixed origin was randomized into 2 parallel treatment groups receiving titrations of an individual optimum dose of alprostadil alpha-cyclodextrin or moxisylyte chlorhydrate. Erectile response was measured by the buckling test. A positive test was associated with axial erection rigidity that did not buckle/deform to 1.0 kg. load. The buckling test was repeated every 10 minutes for up to 60 minutes.
Results: A total of 56 patients (75%) in the alprostadil alpha-cyclodextrin group and 32 patients (40%) in the moxisylyte chlorhydrate group responded with at least 1 positive buckling test during the office period. Investigators assessed erections after alprostadil alpha-cyclodextrin to be adequate for sexual intercourse in 61 patients (81%) compared to 37 patients (46%) after moxisylyte chlorhydrate. All efficacy parameters in office reached statistical significance of p < 0.001 in favor of alprostadil alpha-cyclodextrin. During self-injection therapy at home 58 patients (85%) reported at least 1 rigid erection after alprostadil alpha-cyclodextrin compared to 37 patients (61%) after moxisylyte chlorhydrate. Patient and partner opinion of treatment achieved statistically significantly better scores in the alprostadil alpha-cyclodextrin group compared to the moxisylyte chlorhydrate group.
Conclusions: Alprostadil alpha-cyclodextrin is significantly more effective than moxisylyte chlorhydrate in producing full penile rigidity in office and at home. Injection related side effects occur with the same frequency but moxisylyte results in more systemic side effects and alprostadil results in more painful and prolonged erections. Patients and partners are significantly more satisfied with alprostadil alpha-cyclodextrin.
Comment in
-
After the gold rush--advancing research based care for patients with erectile dysfunction.J Urol. 1998 Jan;159(1):120-1. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64031-x. J Urol. 1998. PMID: 9400451 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Axial penile rigidity as primary efficacy outcome during multi-institutional in-office dose titration clinical trials with alprostadil alfadex in patients with erectile dysfunction. Alprostadil Alfadex Study Group.Int J Impot Res. 2000 Aug;12(4):205-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900543. Int J Impot Res. 2000. PMID: 11079361 Clinical Trial.
-
Erectile response to transurethral alprostadil, prazosin and alprostadil-prazosin combinations.J Urol. 1998 May;159(5):1523-7; discussion 1527-8. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199805000-00030. J Urol. 1998. PMID: 9554347 Clinical Trial.
-
[Efficacy and tolerance of intracavernous injection of moxisylyte in patients with erectile dysfunction: double-blind placebo-controlled study].Prog Urol. 1995 Dec;5(6):985-91. Prog Urol. 1995. PMID: 8777409 Clinical Trial. French.
-
Scoping review exploring advancements in topical agent therapies for erectile dysfunction.Sex Med Rev. 2024 Sep 25;12(4):731-738. doi: 10.1093/sxmrev/qeae056. Sex Med Rev. 2024. PMID: 39128025
-
Evaluation and medical management of erectile dysfunction.Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Mar;81(3):385-90. doi: 10.4065/81.3.385. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006. PMID: 16529142 Review.
Cited by
-
Cyclodextrins: Enhancing Drug Delivery, Solubility and Bioavailability for Modern Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics. 2025 Feb 22;17(3):288. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17030288. Pharmaceutics. 2025. PMID: 40142952 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A risk-benefit assessment of sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.Drug Saf. 2001;24(4):255-65. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200124040-00003. Drug Saf. 2001. PMID: 11330655 Review.
-
[Conservative therapy of erectile dysfunction].Urologe A. 2015 May;54(5):668-75. doi: 10.1007/s00120-015-3794-3. Urologe A. 2015. PMID: 25987332 Review. German.
-
Oral and injectable medications for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.Curr Urol Rep. 2000 Dec;1(4):307-12. doi: 10.1007/s11934-000-0012-6. Curr Urol Rep. 2000. PMID: 12084309 Review.
-
Enhancement of apomorphine-induced penile erection in the rat by a selective alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor antagonist.Br J Pharmacol. 2002 Jul;136(5):701-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704773. Br J Pharmacol. 2002. PMID: 12086979 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical