Risk of adverse effects of intensified treatment in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 9400915
- DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199711)14:11<919::AID-DIA456>3.0.CO;2-A
Risk of adverse effects of intensified treatment in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis
Abstract
While the benefits of intensified insulin treatment in insulin-dependent (Type 1) diabetes mellitus (IDDM) are well recognized, the risks have not been comprehensively characterized. We examined the risk of severe hypoglycaemia, ketoacidosis, and death in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The MEDLINE database, reference lists, and specialist journals were searched electronically or by hand to identify relevant studies with at least 6 months of follow-up and the monitoring of glycaemia by glycosylated haemoglobin measurements. Logistic regression was used for calculation of combined odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The influence of covariates was examined by including covariate-by-treatment interaction terms. Methodological study quality was assessed and sensitivity analyses were performed. Fourteen trials were identified. These contributed 16 comparisons with 1028 patients allocated to intensified and 1039 allocated to conventional treatment. A total of 846 patients suffered at least one episode of severe hypoglycaemia, 175 patients experienced ketoacidosis and 26 patients died. The combined odds ratio (95% CI) for hypoglycaemia was 2.99 (2.45-3.64), for ketoacidosis 1.74 (1.27-2.38) and for death from all causes 1.40 (0.65-3.01). The risk of severe hypoglycaemia was determined by the degree of normalization of glycaemia achieved (p=0.005 for interaction term), with the results from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) in line with the other trials. Ketoacidosis risk depended on the type of intensified treatment used. Odds ratios (95% CI) were 7.20 (2.95-17.58) for exclusive use of pumps, 1.13 (0.15-8.35) for multiple daily injections and 1.28 (0.90-1.83) for trials offering a choice between the two (p = 0.004 for interaction). Mortality was significantly (p = 0.007) increased for causes potentially associated with acute complications (7 vs 0 deaths, 5 deaths attributed to ketoacidosis, and 2 sudden deaths), and non-significantly (p = 0.16) decreased for macrovascular causes (3 vs 8 deaths). We conclude that there is a substantial risk of severe adverse effects associated with intensified insulin treatment. Mortality from acute metabolic causes is increased; however, this is largely counterbalanced by a reduction in cardiovascular mortality. The excess of severe hypoglycemia in the DCCT is not exceptional. Multiple daily injection schemes may be safer than treatment with insulin pumps.
Comment in
- ACP J Club. 1998 Mar-Apr;128(2):31
-
Intensified insulin therapy--is there anything left to argue?Diabet Med. 1997 Nov;14(11):909-10. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199711)14:11<909::AID-DIA534>3.0.CO;2-G. Diabet Med. 1997. PMID: 9400913 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs modern multiple injection regimens in type 1 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Acta Diabetol. 2019 Sep;56(9):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01326-5. Epub 2019 Apr 3. Acta Diabetol. 2019. PMID: 30945047
-
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;3(3):CD013498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013498.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33662147 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Insulin Pump Therapy vs Insulin Injection Therapy With Severe Hypoglycemia, Ketoacidosis, and Glycemic Control Among Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1358-1366. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13994. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 29049584 Free PMC article.
-
[The influence of long-term therapy with the insulin pump (CSII) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus on metabolic compensation and on the incidence of hypoglycaemia. Comparison with intensified conventional insulin therapy (MDI)].Vnitr Lek. 2007 Jun;53(6):637-45. Vnitr Lek. 2007. PMID: 17702123 Czech.
-
Fields of application of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in the treatment of diabetes and implications in the use of rapid-acting insulin analogues.Minerva Endocrinol. 2013 Sep;38(3):321-8. Minerva Endocrinol. 2013. PMID: 24126552 Review.
Cited by
-
Current approaches to the management of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema.Drugs. 2010 Nov 12;70(16):2171-200. doi: 10.2165/11538130-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2010. PMID: 20964459 Review.
-
Diabetic retinopathy - An update.Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;25(2):99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Jan 31. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID: 23960911 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) Pumps for Type 1 and Type 2 Adult Diabetic Populations: An Evidence-Based Analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(20):1-58. Epub 2009 Oct 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009. PMID: 23074525 Free PMC article.
-
Combating diabetic nephropathy with drug therapy.Curr Diab Rep. 2001 Oct;1(2):148-56. doi: 10.1007/s11892-001-0027-5. Curr Diab Rep. 2001. PMID: 12643111 Review.
-
New technologies for diabetes: a review of the present and the future.Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2012 Oct 26;2012(1):28. doi: 10.1186/1687-9856-2012-28. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2012. PMID: 23098076 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical