Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997;76(11):1466-73.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.579.

Platinum-DNA adduct formation in leucocytes of children in relation to pharmacokinetics after cisplatin and carboplatin therapy

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Platinum-DNA adduct formation in leucocytes of children in relation to pharmacokinetics after cisplatin and carboplatin therapy

B Peng et al. Br J Cancer. 1997.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Platinum (Pt)-DNA adducts were measured in peripheral blood leucocytes (PBLs) from 24 children with solid tumours after standard cisplatin and/or carboplatin treatment. The relationship between Pt-DNA adduct levels and pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and carboplatin was investigated. Adduct measurements were performed by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and plasma unbound Pt concentrations were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). There was considerable interindividual variation in Pt-DNA adduct level that was weakly correlated (r2 = 0.32) with the area under the unbound drug concentration vs time curve (AUC) at 6 h after the start of cisplatin infusion, indicating that the variation in Pt-DNA adduct levels was primarily determined by factors other than AUC. No clear relationship between AUC and adduct levels was seen at 24 and 48 h after cisplatin or at 6, 24 or 48 h after carboplatin. Carboplatin produced lower levels of immunoreactive adducts than did cisplatin (1.3 +/- 0.6 nmol Pt g-1 DNA vs 3.2 +/- 1.7 nmol Pt g-1 DNA), despite a 20-fold higher unbound drug AUC for carboplatin (8.0 +/- 3.5 mg ml-1 min vs 0.4 +/- 0.2 mg ml-1 min). This study demonstrates that, after cisplatin and carboplatin treatment the drug-target interaction is determined by both pharmacokinetic and, predominantly, cellular factors. Intrinsic differences between the two complexes, primarily reactivity, probably explain the lower adduct levels observed after carboplatin treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1979;22:71-133 - PubMed
    1. Br J Cancer. 1996 Jun;73(12):1569-75 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Treat Rep. 1983 Feb;67(2):169-72 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 1984 Nov;44(11):5432-8 - PubMed
    1. Chem Biol Interact. 1985 Nov;55(3):275-88 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms