Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Oct;14(9):503-7.
doi: 10.1023/a:1021171225322.

In vitro fertilization with low-dose clomiphene citrate stimulation in women who respond poorly to superovulation

Affiliations

In vitro fertilization with low-dose clomiphene citrate stimulation in women who respond poorly to superovulation

A O Awonuga et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Our experience with IVF using low-dose clomiphene citrate for stimulation in "non-" and "poor" responders was reviewed and the treatment outcomes with the previous controlled ovarian stimulation cycles in which hMG and GnRH agonist were used were compared.

Methods: The treatment outcome in 11 non- and 20 poor responders having 30 and 53 clomiphene citrate IVF treatment cycles, respectively, were compared with the treatment outcome in the previous long-protocol buserelin/hMG cycles.

Results: The clinical pregnancy rates per oocyte collection achieved in the first clomiphene citrate cycle in non (9.1%)- and poor (10%) responders were comparable to those achieved by poor responders (11.9%) who had buserelin/hMG using the long protocol. Although the numbers were small, a similar pregnancy rate could still be achieved in poor responders up to the third attempt using clomiphene citrate.

Conclusions: IVF using long-protocol buserelin/hMG is more successful than using clomiphene citrate stimulation. However, this advantage may not be significant in those women with a previous poor response to buserelin/hMG. It is suggested that for such poor responders, three attempts of IVF in a clomiphene citrate cycle may offer a viable therapeutic alternative before reverting to more stressful, expensive, and time-consuming treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jenkins JM, Davies DW, Devonport H, Anthony FW, Gadd SC, Watson RH, Masson GM. Comparison of “poor” responders with “good” responders using standard buserelin/human menopausal gonadotropin regime for in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:918–921. - PubMed
    1. McKenna KM, Foster P, McBain J, Martin M, Johnston WI: Combined treatment with gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist and gonadotrophins in poor responders hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF): Clinical and endocrine results. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;29:428–432. - PubMed
    1. Karande VC, Rinehatt J, Miller EC, Pratt DE, Morris R, Levrant S, Rao R, Balin M, Bricksin M, Gleicher N. The value of stimulating poor responders using “flare” protocol in cycles with low basal FSH concentrations during IVF. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:200. - PubMed
    1. Dor J, Seidman DS, Amudai E, Bider D, Levran D, Mashiach S. Adjuvant growth hormone therapy in poor responders to in-vitro fertilisation: A prospective randomised placebo-controlled double blind study. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:40–43. - PubMed
    1. Steinkampf MP, Kretzer PA, McElroy E, Conway-Myers BA: A simplified approach to in vitro fertilisation. J Reprod Med. 1992;37:199–204. - PubMed

MeSH terms