Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Oct;14(9):531-7.
doi: 10.1023/a:1021131511209.

Effects of cryopreserved semen quality and timed intrauterine insemination on pregnancy rate and gender of offspring in a donor insemination program

R S Sidhu  1 , R K Sharma, A Agarwal
Affiliations

Effects of cryopreserved semen quality and timed intrauterine insemination on pregnancy rate and gender of offspring in a donor insemination program

R S Sidhu et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to study the relationship among cryopreserved donor semen quality, pregnancy rates, and preconception sex selection after intrauterine insemination.

Methods: We reviewed the records of the 203 women in our donor insemination program from 1987 to 1994 who became pregnant after more than one insemination cycle and had no female-factor infertility. They were categorized according to the number of cycles required for pregnancy. Semen samples from 54 donors were analyzed before freezing and after thawing. Specimens resulting in pregnancy were compared to specimens from the same donor that did not. Semen characteristics were compared to gender of the child.

Results: Two hundred fifty two-women became pregnant of the 422 who were enrolled. The pregnancy rate per cycle was 13%. Semen quality was not related to pregnancy outcome or offspring gender. However, more male children (101 vs 83) were born.

Conclusions: Semen characteristics in good-quality cryopreserved donor semen do not affect pregnancy rate or offspring gender.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gerber WL, Bresaw LS. Semen abnormalities in artificial insemination donor candidates. J Urol. 1983;130:266–268. - PubMed
    1. Nachtigall RD. Donor insemination and human immunodeficiency virus: A risk/benefit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1692–1696. - PubMed
    1. Schover LR, Thomas AJ, Miller KF, Falcone T, Goldberg J. Preferences for intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus donor insemination in severe male factor infertility: A preliminary report. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2461–2464. - PubMed
    1. Vogt PH. Genetic aspects of artificial fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:128–137. - PubMed
    1. Carson SA. Sex selection: The ultimate in family planning. Fertil Steril. 1988;50:16–19. - PubMed