Cefixime: an oral option for the treatment of multidrug-resistant enteric fever in children
- PMID: 9404906
Cefixime: an oral option for the treatment of multidrug-resistant enteric fever in children
Abstract
Background: Enteric fever is a serious public health problem in Pakistan, where multidrug-resistant salmonellosis causes enteric fever with increased morbidity and mortality. Costly parenteral therapy and lack of an established safety profile for the use of quinolones in children necessitate evaluation of an oral treatment option. This study is meant to assess the efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness of an oral third-generation cephalosporin (cefixime) in the treatment of multidrug-resistant enteric fever.
Methods: Between November 1993 and October 1994, 85 patients, 15 years of age or less, with culture-proven enteric fever were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (n = 41) received cefixime at a dosage of 10 mg/kg to 12 mg/kg per day in two divided doses. Group B (n = 44) received chloramphenicol at a dosage of 100 mg/kg daily in four divided doses. Both groups were treated for 2 weeks.
Results: In group A, 95% (39/41) of the patients receiving cefixime responded favorably, whereas in group B, 30% (14/45) responded to chloramphenicol. The 31 patients not cured in group B were then successfully treated with cefixime. Overall, cefixime was well tolerated. Subsequent antibiogram data showed an overall multidrug-resistance rate of 78% (66/85).
Conclusions: Cefixime is a safe, effective, and cheaper oral option for the treatment of multidrug-resistant enteric fever. Further studies are needed, however, to validate this observation.
Similar articles
-
Cefixime in the treatment of enteric fever in children.Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1993;19(1):47-9. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1993. PMID: 8223140
-
In vitro activity of cefixime versus ceftizoxime against Salmonella typhi.Pathol Biol (Paris). 1997 May;45(5):415-9. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1997. PMID: 9296095
-
A comparative study of cefixime and chloramphenicol in children with typhoid fever.J Pak Med Assoc. 1998 Jun;48(6):163-4. J Pak Med Assoc. 1998. PMID: 9813986 Clinical Trial.
-
Once-a-day therapy for sinusitis: a comparison study of cefixime and amoxicillin.Laryngoscope. 1993 Jan;103(1 Pt 1):33-41. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199301000-00008. Laryngoscope. 1993. PMID: 8421417 Review.
-
The treatment of multidrug-resistant and nalidixic acid-resistant typhoid fever in Viet Nam.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Jul;98(7):413-22. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2003.10.014. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004. PMID: 15138078 Review.
Cited by
-
Antibiotics for Travelers: What's Good and What's Not.Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2004 Feb;6(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11908-004-0019-0. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2004. PMID: 14733844
-
Open label comparative trial of mono versus dual antibiotic therapy for Typhoid Fever in adults.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Apr 23;12(4):e0006380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006380. eCollection 2018 Apr. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018. PMID: 29684022 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of enteric fever (typhoid and paratyphoid fever) with cephalosporins.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 24;11(11):CD010452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010452.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36420914 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro activity of cefpodoxime, an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin, against Salmonella enterica serotype typhi.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Feb;52(2):802-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00867-07. Epub 2007 Nov 26. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008. PMID: 18039924 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Mechanism of therapeutic effectiveness of cefixime against typhoid fever.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Sep;45(9):2450-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.9.2450-2454.2001. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001. PMID: 11502513 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources