Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1997 Dec;11(6):593-8.

Prophylactic use of low-dose urodilatin for prevention of renal impairment following liver transplantation: a randomized placebo-controlled study

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9408691
Clinical Trial

Prophylactic use of low-dose urodilatin for prevention of renal impairment following liver transplantation: a randomized placebo-controlled study

J M Langrehr et al. Clin Transplant. 1997 Dec.

Abstract

Many therapeutic measures have been employed to prevent or at least ameliorate postoperative renal impairment following liver transplantation. Recent clinical phase II studies have demonstrated that the new natriuretic peptide urodilatin has beneficial effects on renal function following heart and liver transplantation. The present study reports the first prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial of prophylactic urodilatin administration following liver transplantation. Seventy consecutive recipients of primary liver transplants were included in the study following randomization, and 33 patients continuously received urodilatin at a dose of 20 ng/kg/min for 7 d. The remaining 37 patients received a placebo infusion for the same time period. The course of serum creatinine and urea did not differ between the two groups nor did the daily urine production. However, the urodilatin group showed a higher preoperative median serum creatinine and a significant reduction on days 1 and 2, whereas this observation was not made in the placebo group. Furthermore, less furosemide was administered to the patients in the urodilatin group during the first 2 d. The incidence of postoperative hemodialysis and the number of treatments did not differ between the groups either (urodilatin group 4, vs. placebo group 6 and 22 for both groups, respectively). Side effects of the urodilatin therapy were not detected. The prophylactic low-dose urodilatin administration resulted in a trend towards amelioration of the renal function, but did not result in significant differences between the two experimental groups. Further studies, using higher doses, will be required to define the value of urodilatin for prevention of renal impairment after liver transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources