Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Nov 1;100(9):2354-61.
doi: 10.1172/JCI119775.

Evidence for decreased splanchnic glucose uptake after oral glucose administration in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Affiliations

Evidence for decreased splanchnic glucose uptake after oral glucose administration in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

B Ludvik et al. J Clin Invest. .

Abstract

The role of splanchnic glucose uptake (SGU) after oral glucose administration as a potential factor contributing to postprandial hyperglycemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) has not been established conclusively. Therefore, we investigated SGU in six patients with NIDDM and six weight-matched control subjects by means of the hepatic vein catheterization (HVC) technique. In a second part, we examined the applicability of the recently developed OG-CLAMP technique in NIDDM by comparing SGU and first-pass SGU during HVC with SGU during the OG-CLAMP experiment. The OG-CLAMP method combines a euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp and an oral glucose tolerance test (75 g) during steady state glucose infusion (GINF). During HVC, SGU equals the splanchnic fractional extraction times the total (oral and arterial) glucose load presented to the liver. For OG-CLAMP, SGU was calculated as first-pass SGU by subtracting the integrated decrease in GINF over 180 min from 75 g. Cumulative splanchnic glucose output after oral glucose correlated significantly between both methods and was increased significantly in NIDDM patients (73.1+/-5.1 g for HVC, 76.5+/-5.5 for OG-CLAMP) compared with nondiabetic patients (46.7+/-4.4 g for HVC, 57.5+/-1.9 for OG-CLAMP). Thus, in NIDDM patients, SGU (7.4+/-2.1 vs. 37.8+/-5.9% in nondiabetic patients, P < 0.001) and first-pass SGU (4.7+/-1.7 vs. 26.5+/-5.1% in nondiabetic patients, P < 0.01) were decreased significantly during HVC, as was SGU during OG-CLAMP (3.9+/-1.7 vs. 23.4+/-2.5% in nondiabetic patients, P < 0.0001). SGU measured during OG-CLAMP correlated significantly with SGU (r = 0.87, P < 0.05 for NIDDM patients; r = 0.94, P < 0.01 for nondiabetic patients) and first-pass SGU (r = 0.87, P < 0.05 for NIDDM patients; r = 0.84, P < 0.05 for nondiabetic patients) during HVC. In conclusion, (a) SGU after oral glucose administration is decreased in NIDDM as measured by both methods, and (b) SGU during the OG-CLAMP is well-correlated to SGU and first-pass SGU during HVC in NIDDM. The decrease in SGU in NIDDM might contribute to postprandial hyperglycemia in diabetic subjects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Invest. 1986 Aug;78(2):472-81 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1952 Oct;31(10):928-37 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes. 1991 Jan;40(1):73-81 - PubMed
    1. Endocr Rev. 1985 Winter;6(1):45-86 - PubMed
    1. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991 Apr;17(4):615-20 - PubMed

Publication types