Thromboembolic risk and pacemakers

Comparative Study

C Gibbs et al. Lancet. 1997.

. 1997 Dec 13;350(9093):1780-1.

doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)63613-6.

No abstract available

Comment on

Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome.
Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Thuesen L, Mortensen PT, Vesterlund T, Pedersen AK. Andersen HR, et al. Lancet. 1997 Oct 25;350(9086):1210-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03425-9. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 9652562 Clinical Trial.

Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing.
Shibolet O, Amit G. Shibolet O, et al. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 9;343(19):1418. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 11183886 No abstract available.
[The indication, complications and contraindication for DDD pacing].
Miyawaki F, Suma K. Miyawaki F, et al. Nihon Rinsho. 1990 Feb;48(2):356-62. Nihon Rinsho. 1990. PMID: 2329709 Japanese. No abstract available.
Pacing for treatment and prevention of atrial fibrillation: Is there an end to this story?
Kantharia BK. Kantharia BK. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Aug;12(8):1726-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.044. Epub 2015 May 6. Heart Rhythm. 2015. PMID: 25956963 No abstract available.
Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Current status of a modern approach in pacing.
Sideris S, Archontakis S, Dilaveris P, Gatzoulis KA, Trachanas K, Sotiropoulos I, Arsenos P, Tousoulis D, Kallikazaros I. Sideris S, et al. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017 Nov-Dec;58(6):403-410. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 18. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28529181 Review.
[Technical aspects of standard pacemakers].
Torresani J. Torresani J. Rev Prat. 1982 Dec 11;32(57-58):3581-90. Rev Prat. 1982. PMID: 6761835 Review. French. No abstract available.