Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Nov;41(5):600-5.
doi: 10.1136/gut.41.5.600.

Oesophageal motor responses to gastro-oesophageal reflux in healthy controls and reflux patients

Affiliations

Oesophageal motor responses to gastro-oesophageal reflux in healthy controls and reflux patients

A Anggiansah et al. Gut. 1997 Nov.

Abstract

Aims: To compare oesophageal motor responses to gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) in 16 healthy controls (group 1) and 25 reflux patients, 15 without (group 2) and 10 with (group 3) oesophagitis.

Methods: All subjects underwent 24 hour ambulatory oesophageal pH measurements (5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS)) combined with pressure monitoring (5, 10, and 15 cm above the LOS for oesophageal body motility and 27 cm above the LOS for voluntary swallow detection). Contraction patterns (peristaltic, simultaneous, isolated, mixed type, and non-transmitted swallows) and peristaltic contraction wave characteristics (amplitude, duration, and velocity) during GOR were compared in the three groups.

Results: The average number of motor activities per minute was significantly higher in group 1 (p < 0.05). In all groups, the most common motor contraction pattern was peristaltic. The percentage of peristaltic activity per subject was significantly higher in group 1 (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other contraction patterns among the three groups (p > 0.05). Of the peristaltic contraction wave characteristics there were no significant differences in any parameters (amplitude, duration, and velocity) among the three groups (p > 0.05). The average pH increment in response to motor activities was significantly higher in group 1 (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Motor responses to GOR were found to be predominantly primary peristaltic in all groups. During GOR, reflux patients have less frequent activity, a smaller proportion of activity is peristaltic, and the average pH increment in response to motor activities is reduced compared with controls.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
: Percentages of different motor activities during GOR in the upright (A) and supine (B) period.
Figure 2
Figure 2
: Percentages of different primary (A) and secondary (B) activities during GOR.
Figure 3
Figure 3
: Comparison of the mean (SD) percentages of each of the five types of motor activity (peristaltic, simultaneous, isolated, mixed type contractions, and non-transmitted swallow) between the three groups. *p<0.05 group 1 v groups 2 and 3.
Figure 4
Figure 4
: Mean (SD) pH increments in response to each type of motor activity during the total period.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1974 Oct;62(4):325-32 - PubMed
    1. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1993 Jan-Feb;27(1):49-55 - PubMed
    1. Am J Dig Dis. 1977 Dec;22(12):1049-54 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1978;13(4):443-7 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1983 Sep;85(3):607-12 - PubMed