Similar articles

• [Risk reduction in carotid surgery by monitoring somatosensory evoked potentials].

  Schweiger H, Dinkel M, Lang W. Schweiger H, et al. Vasa Suppl. 1992;35:21. Vasa Suppl. 1992. PMID: 1481046 German. No abstract available.
• [Can the reliability of sensory evoked potential monitoring during carotid artery surgery be improved?].

  Erasmi H, Walter M, Löhr G. Erasmi H, et al. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:1293-4. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997. PMID: 9574407 German.
• [Neurophysiologic monitoring in neurosurgical vascular operations: specific technical requirements and their conversion].

  Hinrichs H, Heinze HJ, Gaab MR. Hinrichs H, et al. EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1992 Dec;23(4):195-202. EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1992. PMID: 1486824 Review. German.
• [Neurophysiologic monitoring in cardiac surgery interventions].

  Engelhardt W. Engelhardt W. Klin Anasthesiol Intensivther. 1994;46:201-7. Klin Anasthesiol Intensivther. 1994. PMID: 8065095 Review. German. No abstract available.
• The use of somatosensory evoked responses in carotid surgery for monitoring brain function.

  De Vleeschauwer P, Horsch S, Haupt WF, Huber P. De Vleeschauwer P, et al. Acta Chir Belg. 1985 Sep-Oct;85(5):293-8. Acta Chir Belg. 1985. PMID: 4082850