[Echographic measurement of the inferior uterine segment for assessing the risk of uterine rupture]
- PMID: 9417464
[Echographic measurement of the inferior uterine segment for assessing the risk of uterine rupture]
Erratum in
- J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1997;26(8):839
Abstract
Background: Ultrasonography has been used to examine the scarred uterus in women who have had previous cesarean sections in an attempt to assess the risk of rupture of the scar during subsequent labor. The predictive value of such measurements has not been adequately assessed, however. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment before labor in predicting the risk of intrapartum uterine rupture.
Methods: In this prospective observational study, the obstetricians were not told the ultrasonographic findings and did not use them to make decisions about type of delivery. Eligible patients were those with previous cesarean sections booked for delivery at our hospital. 642 patients underwent ultrasound examination at 36-38 weeks' gestation, and were allocated to four groups according to the thickness of the lower uterine segment. Ultrasonographic findings were compared with those of physical examination at delivery.
Findings: The overall frequency of defective scars was 4.0% (15 uterine ruptures and 10 dehiscences). The frequency of defects rose as the thickness of the lower uterine segment decreased: there were no defects among 278 women with measurements greater than 4.5 mm, three (2%) among 177 patients with values of 3.6-4.5 mm, 14 (10%) among 136 patients with values of 2.6-3.5 mm, and eight (16%) among 51 women with values of 1.6-2.5 mm. With a cut-off value of 3.5 mm, the sensitivity of ultrasonographic measurement was 88.0%, the specificity 73.2%, positive predictive value 11.8%, and negative predictive value 99.3%.
Interpretation: Our results show that the risk of a defective scar is directly correlated to the degree of thinning of the lower uterine segment at around 37 weeks of pregnancy. The high negative predictive value of the method may encourage obstetricians in hospitals where routine repeat elective cesarean is the standard procedure to offer a trial of labor to patients with a thickness value of 3.5 mm or greater.
Comment in
-
[Apropos of evaluating the risk of uterine rupture by ultrasonic assessment of the inferior uterine segment].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1997;26(5):545-7. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1997. PMID: 9417471 French. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus.Lancet. 1996 Feb 3;347(8997):281-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90464-x. Lancet. 1996. PMID: 8569360
-
[Lower Uterine Segment Trial: A pragmatic open multicenter randomized trial].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Apr;46(4):427-432. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Apr 4. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 29625873 Clinical Trial. French.
-
Lower uterine segment thickness to prevent uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcomes: a multicenter prospective study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):604.e1-604.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27342045
-
Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;42(2):132-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.12479. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23576473 Review.
-
Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness after prior cesarean section to predict uterine rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):830-841. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13585. Epub 2019 Mar 29. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019. PMID: 30779345