Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Nov;25(6):812-8.
doi: 10.3758/bf03211325.

Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality

Affiliations

Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality

L Casini et al. Mem Cognit. 1997 Nov.

Abstract

The "attentional model" of time estimation assumes that temporal judgments depend on the amount of attention allocated to the temporal processor (the timer). One of the main predictions of this model is that an interval will be judged shorter when attention is not allocated to the temporal parameters of the task. Previous studies combining temporal and nontemporal tasks (dual-task method) have suggested that the time spent processing the target duration might be a key factor. The less time devoted by the subject to the temporal task, the shorter the judged duration. In the two experiments presented here, subjects were asked to judge both the duration of a visual stimulus and an increment in intensity occurring at any time during this stimulus. In the second experiment, trials without intensity increments were added. The main result is that the judged duration was shorter when the increment occurred later in the stimulus or did not occur. In those cases, subjects had been expecting increment occurrence during most part of the stimulus and thus had focused for a shorter time on stimulus duration. We propose that attention shifts related to expectancy and to detection of the increment reduce subjective duration.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Science. 1978 Oct 20;202(4365):315-8 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1981 Jul;7(3):242-68 - PubMed
    1. Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):673-86 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Monogr. 1963;77(13):1-31 - PubMed
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984;423:528-41 - PubMed